Tornado Intensity Estimation: Past, Present, and FutureSource: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2013:;volume( 094 ):;issue: 005::page 641Author:Edwards, Roger
,
LaDue, James G.
,
Ferree, John T.
,
Scharfenberg, Kevin
,
Maier, Chris
,
Coulbourne, William L.
DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00006.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: e early to middle 2000s, in response to demand for more detail in wind damage surveying and recordkeeping, a team of atmospheric scientists and wind engineers developed the enhanced Fujita (EF) scale. The EF scale, codified officially into National Weather Service (NWS) use in February 2007, offers wind speed estimates for a range of degrees of damage (DoDs) across each of 28 damage indicators (DIs). In practice, this has increased precision of damage surveys for tornado and thunderstorm-wind events. Still, concerns remain about both the representativeness of DoDs and the sufficiency of DIs, including the following: How dependable are the wind speed ranges for certain DoDs? What other DIs can be included? How can recent advances in mapping and documentation tools be integrated into the surveying process and the storm records? What changes should be made to the existing scale: why, how, and by whom? What alternative methods may be included or adapted for estimating tornado intensity? To begin coordinated discussion on these and related topics, interested scientists and engineers (including some involved in EF scale development) organized a national EF Scale Stakeholders' Meeting, held on 2?3 March 2010 in Norman, Oklahoma. This article presents more detailed background information, summarizes the meeting, presents possibilities for the future of the EF scale and damage surveys, and solicits ideas from the engineering and atmospheric science communities.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Edwards, Roger | |
contributor author | LaDue, James G. | |
contributor author | Ferree, John T. | |
contributor author | Scharfenberg, Kevin | |
contributor author | Maier, Chris | |
contributor author | Coulbourne, William L. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:43:48Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:43:48Z | |
date copyright | 2013/05/01 | |
date issued | 2013 | |
identifier issn | 0003-0007 | |
identifier other | ams-73103.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4215181 | |
description abstract | e early to middle 2000s, in response to demand for more detail in wind damage surveying and recordkeeping, a team of atmospheric scientists and wind engineers developed the enhanced Fujita (EF) scale. The EF scale, codified officially into National Weather Service (NWS) use in February 2007, offers wind speed estimates for a range of degrees of damage (DoDs) across each of 28 damage indicators (DIs). In practice, this has increased precision of damage surveys for tornado and thunderstorm-wind events. Still, concerns remain about both the representativeness of DoDs and the sufficiency of DIs, including the following: How dependable are the wind speed ranges for certain DoDs? What other DIs can be included? How can recent advances in mapping and documentation tools be integrated into the surveying process and the storm records? What changes should be made to the existing scale: why, how, and by whom? What alternative methods may be included or adapted for estimating tornado intensity? To begin coordinated discussion on these and related topics, interested scientists and engineers (including some involved in EF scale development) organized a national EF Scale Stakeholders' Meeting, held on 2?3 March 2010 in Norman, Oklahoma. This article presents more detailed background information, summarizes the meeting, presents possibilities for the future of the EF scale and damage surveys, and solicits ideas from the engineering and atmospheric science communities. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Tornado Intensity Estimation: Past, Present, and Future | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 94 | |
journal issue | 5 | |
journal title | Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00006.1 | |
journal fristpage | 641 | |
journal lastpage | 653 | |
tree | Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2013:;volume( 094 ):;issue: 005 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |