| contributor author | Medeiros, Brian | |
| contributor author | Deser, Clara | |
| contributor author | Tomas, Robert A. | |
| contributor author | Kay, Jennifer E. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:39:58Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T16:39:58Z | |
| date copyright | 2011/09/01 | |
| date issued | 2011 | |
| identifier issn | 0894-8755 | |
| identifier other | ams-71839.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4213775 | |
| description abstract | ecent work indicates that climate models have a positive bias in the strength of the wintertime low-level temperature inversion over the high-latitude Northern Hemisphere. It has been argued this bias leads to underestimates of the Arctic?s surface temperature response to anthropogenic forcing. Here the bias in inversion strength is revisited. The spatial distribution of low-level stability is found to be bimodal in climate models and observational reanalysis products, with low-level inversions represented by a stable primary mode over the interior Arctic Ocean and adjacent continents, and a secondary unstable mode over the Atlantic Ocean. Averaging over these differing conditions is detrimental to understanding the origins of the inversion strength bias. While nearly all of the 21 models examined overestimate the area-average inversion strength, conditionally sampling the two modes shows about half the models are biased because of the relative partitioning of the modes and half because of biases within the stable mode. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | Arctic Inversion Strength in Climate Models | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 24 | |
| journal issue | 17 | |
| journal title | Journal of Climate | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/2011JCLI3968.1 | |
| journal fristpage | 4733 | |
| journal lastpage | 4740 | |
| tree | Journal of Climate:;2011:;volume( 024 ):;issue: 017 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |