Show simple item record

contributor authorMedeiros, Brian
contributor authorDeser, Clara
contributor authorTomas, Robert A.
contributor authorKay, Jennifer E.
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:39:58Z
date available2017-06-09T16:39:58Z
date copyright2011/09/01
date issued2011
identifier issn0894-8755
identifier otherams-71839.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4213775
description abstractecent work indicates that climate models have a positive bias in the strength of the wintertime low-level temperature inversion over the high-latitude Northern Hemisphere. It has been argued this bias leads to underestimates of the Arctic?s surface temperature response to anthropogenic forcing. Here the bias in inversion strength is revisited. The spatial distribution of low-level stability is found to be bimodal in climate models and observational reanalysis products, with low-level inversions represented by a stable primary mode over the interior Arctic Ocean and adjacent continents, and a secondary unstable mode over the Atlantic Ocean. Averaging over these differing conditions is detrimental to understanding the origins of the inversion strength bias. While nearly all of the 21 models examined overestimate the area-average inversion strength, conditionally sampling the two modes shows about half the models are biased because of the relative partitioning of the modes and half because of biases within the stable mode.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleArctic Inversion Strength in Climate Models
typeJournal Paper
journal volume24
journal issue17
journal titleJournal of Climate
identifier doi10.1175/2011JCLI3968.1
journal fristpage4733
journal lastpage4740
treeJournal of Climate:;2011:;volume( 024 ):;issue: 017
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record