Decision Making by Austin, Texas, Residents in Hypothetical Tornado ScenariosSource: Weather, Climate, and Society:;2010:;volume( 002 ):;issue: 003::page 249Author:Schultz, David M.
,
Gruntfest, Eve C.
,
Hayden, Mary H.
,
Benight, Charles C.
,
Drobot, Sheldon
,
Barnes, Lindsey R.
DOI: 10.1175/2010WCAS1067.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: One of the goals of the Warning Project is to understand how people receive warnings of hazardous weather and subsequently use this information to make decisions. As part of the project, 519 surveys from Austin, Texas, floodplain residents were collected and analyzed. About 90% of respondents understood that a tornado warning represented a more serious and more likely threat than a tornado watch. Most respondents (86%) were not concerned about a limited number of false alarms or close calls reducing their confidence in future warnings, suggesting no cry-wolf effect. Most respondents reported safe decisions in two hypothetical scenarios: a tornado warning issued while the respondent was home and a tornado visible by the respondent while driving. However, nearly half the respondents indicated that they would seek shelter from a tornado under a highway overpass if they were driving. Despite the limitations of this study, these results suggest that more education is needed on the dangers of highway overpasses as shelter from severe weather.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Schultz, David M. | |
contributor author | Gruntfest, Eve C. | |
contributor author | Hayden, Mary H. | |
contributor author | Benight, Charles C. | |
contributor author | Drobot, Sheldon | |
contributor author | Barnes, Lindsey R. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:38:56Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:38:56Z | |
date copyright | 2010/07/01 | |
date issued | 2010 | |
identifier issn | 1948-8327 | |
identifier other | ams-71546.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4213450 | |
description abstract | One of the goals of the Warning Project is to understand how people receive warnings of hazardous weather and subsequently use this information to make decisions. As part of the project, 519 surveys from Austin, Texas, floodplain residents were collected and analyzed. About 90% of respondents understood that a tornado warning represented a more serious and more likely threat than a tornado watch. Most respondents (86%) were not concerned about a limited number of false alarms or close calls reducing their confidence in future warnings, suggesting no cry-wolf effect. Most respondents reported safe decisions in two hypothetical scenarios: a tornado warning issued while the respondent was home and a tornado visible by the respondent while driving. However, nearly half the respondents indicated that they would seek shelter from a tornado under a highway overpass if they were driving. Despite the limitations of this study, these results suggest that more education is needed on the dangers of highway overpasses as shelter from severe weather. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Decision Making by Austin, Texas, Residents in Hypothetical Tornado Scenarios | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 2 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Weather, Climate, and Society | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/2010WCAS1067.1 | |
journal fristpage | 249 | |
journal lastpage | 254 | |
tree | Weather, Climate, and Society:;2010:;volume( 002 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |