Show simple item record

contributor authorSchultz, David M.
contributor authorGruntfest, Eve C.
contributor authorHayden, Mary H.
contributor authorBenight, Charles C.
contributor authorDrobot, Sheldon
contributor authorBarnes, Lindsey R.
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:38:56Z
date available2017-06-09T16:38:56Z
date copyright2010/07/01
date issued2010
identifier issn1948-8327
identifier otherams-71546.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4213450
description abstractOne of the goals of the Warning Project is to understand how people receive warnings of hazardous weather and subsequently use this information to make decisions. As part of the project, 519 surveys from Austin, Texas, floodplain residents were collected and analyzed. About 90% of respondents understood that a tornado warning represented a more serious and more likely threat than a tornado watch. Most respondents (86%) were not concerned about a limited number of false alarms or close calls reducing their confidence in future warnings, suggesting no cry-wolf effect. Most respondents reported safe decisions in two hypothetical scenarios: a tornado warning issued while the respondent was home and a tornado visible by the respondent while driving. However, nearly half the respondents indicated that they would seek shelter from a tornado under a highway overpass if they were driving. Despite the limitations of this study, these results suggest that more education is needed on the dangers of highway overpasses as shelter from severe weather.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleDecision Making by Austin, Texas, Residents in Hypothetical Tornado Scenarios
typeJournal Paper
journal volume2
journal issue3
journal titleWeather, Climate, and Society
identifier doi10.1175/2010WCAS1067.1
journal fristpage249
journal lastpage254
treeWeather, Climate, and Society:;2010:;volume( 002 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record