YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparing MODIS and AIRS Infrared-Based Cloud Retrievals

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2010:;volume( 050 ):;issue: 005::page 1057
    Author:
    Nasiri, Shaima L.
    ,
    Van T. Dang, H.
    ,
    Kahn, Brian H.
    ,
    Fetzer, Eric J.
    ,
    Manning, Evan M.
    ,
    Schreier, Mathias M.
    ,
    Frey, Richard A.
    DOI: 10.1175/2010JAMC2603.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: omparisons are described for infrared-derived cloud products retrieved from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) using measured spatial response functions obtained from prelaunch AIRS calibration. One full day (1 January 2005) of global collection-5 MODIS and version-5 AIRS retrievals of cloud-top temperature Tc, effective cloud fraction f, and derived effective brightness temperature Tb,e is investigated. Comparisons of Tb,e demonstrate that MODIS and AIRS are essentially radiatively consistent and that MODIS Tb,e is 0.62 K higher than AIRS Tb,e for all scenes, increasing to 1.43 K for cloud described by AIRS as single layer and decreasing to 0.50 K for two-layer clouds. Somewhat larger differences in Tc and f are observed between the two instruments. The magnitudes of differences depend partly on whether MODIS uses a CO2-slicing or 11-?m brightness temperature window retrieval method. Some cloud- and regime-type differences and similarities between AIRS and MODIS cloud products are traceable to the assumptions made about the number of cloud layers in AIRS and also to the MODIS retrieval method. This (partially) holistic comparison approach should be useful for ongoing algorithm refinements, rigorous assessments of climate applicability, and establishment of the capability of synergistic MODIS and AIRS retrievals for improved cloud quantities and also should be useful for future observations to be made by the National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS) Preparatory Project (NPP).
    • Download: (3.664Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparing MODIS and AIRS Infrared-Based Cloud Retrievals

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4211880
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNasiri, Shaima L.
    contributor authorVan T. Dang, H.
    contributor authorKahn, Brian H.
    contributor authorFetzer, Eric J.
    contributor authorManning, Evan M.
    contributor authorSchreier, Mathias M.
    contributor authorFrey, Richard A.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:34:07Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:34:07Z
    date copyright2011/05/01
    date issued2010
    identifier issn1558-8424
    identifier otherams-70132.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4211880
    description abstractomparisons are described for infrared-derived cloud products retrieved from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) using measured spatial response functions obtained from prelaunch AIRS calibration. One full day (1 January 2005) of global collection-5 MODIS and version-5 AIRS retrievals of cloud-top temperature Tc, effective cloud fraction f, and derived effective brightness temperature Tb,e is investigated. Comparisons of Tb,e demonstrate that MODIS and AIRS are essentially radiatively consistent and that MODIS Tb,e is 0.62 K higher than AIRS Tb,e for all scenes, increasing to 1.43 K for cloud described by AIRS as single layer and decreasing to 0.50 K for two-layer clouds. Somewhat larger differences in Tc and f are observed between the two instruments. The magnitudes of differences depend partly on whether MODIS uses a CO2-slicing or 11-?m brightness temperature window retrieval method. Some cloud- and regime-type differences and similarities between AIRS and MODIS cloud products are traceable to the assumptions made about the number of cloud layers in AIRS and also to the MODIS retrieval method. This (partially) holistic comparison approach should be useful for ongoing algorithm refinements, rigorous assessments of climate applicability, and establishment of the capability of synergistic MODIS and AIRS retrievals for improved cloud quantities and also should be useful for future observations to be made by the National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS) Preparatory Project (NPP).
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComparing MODIS and AIRS Infrared-Based Cloud Retrievals
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume50
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    identifier doi10.1175/2010JAMC2603.1
    journal fristpage1057
    journal lastpage1072
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2010:;volume( 050 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian