ReplySource: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2010:;volume( 050 ):;issue: 001::page 267Author:Makkonen, Lasse
DOI: 10.1175/2010JAMC2533.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: This reply addresses the use of order statistics in extreme value analysis. The author has previously proposed in this journal that the distribution-dependent estimators of plotting position in extreme value analysis should be abandoned and replaced by the Weibull formula. It was also demonstrated that the use of the wrong plotting positions has resulted in underestimation of the probability of extreme-weather events. Cook?s comments challenge these developments and defend the previously presented plotting methods. In this reply it is outlined that the Weibull formula provides the exact probability PI of nonexceedance in order-ranked data. Hence, there is no sampling error related to PI. This renders Cook?s primary arguments invalid. The specific critical comments by Cook are also replied to and are shown to be unfounded.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Makkonen, Lasse | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:34:02Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:34:02Z | |
date copyright | 2011/01/01 | |
date issued | 2010 | |
identifier issn | 1558-8424 | |
identifier other | ams-70106.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4211851 | |
description abstract | This reply addresses the use of order statistics in extreme value analysis. The author has previously proposed in this journal that the distribution-dependent estimators of plotting position in extreme value analysis should be abandoned and replaced by the Weibull formula. It was also demonstrated that the use of the wrong plotting positions has resulted in underestimation of the probability of extreme-weather events. Cook?s comments challenge these developments and defend the previously presented plotting methods. In this reply it is outlined that the Weibull formula provides the exact probability PI of nonexceedance in order-ranked data. Hence, there is no sampling error related to PI. This renders Cook?s primary arguments invalid. The specific critical comments by Cook are also replied to and are shown to be unfounded. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Reply | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 50 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/2010JAMC2533.1 | |
journal fristpage | 267 | |
journal lastpage | 270 | |
tree | Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2010:;volume( 050 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |