YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comprehensive Automated Quality Assurance of Daily Surface Observations

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2010:;volume( 049 ):;issue: 008::page 1615
    Author:
    Durre, Imke
    ,
    Menne, Matthew J.
    ,
    Gleason, Byron E.
    ,
    Houston, Tamara G.
    ,
    Vose, Russell S.
    DOI: 10.1175/2010JAMC2375.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: This paper describes a comprehensive set of fully automated quality assurance (QA) procedures for observations of daily surface temperature, precipitation, snowfall, and snow depth. The QA procedures are being applied operationally to the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN)-Daily dataset. Since these data are used for analyzing and monitoring variations in extremes, the QA system is designed to detect as many errors as possible while maintaining a low probability of falsely identifying true meteorological events as erroneous. The system consists of 19 carefully evaluated tests that detect duplicate data, climatological outliers, and various inconsistencies (internal, temporal, and spatial). Manual review of random samples of the values flagged as errors is used to set the threshold for each procedure such that its false-positive rate, or fraction of valid values identified as errors, is minimized. In addition, the tests are arranged in a deliberate sequence in which the performance of the later checks is enhanced by the error detection capabilities of the earlier tests. Based on an assessment of each individual check and a final evaluation for each element, the system identifies 3.6 million (0.24%) of the more than 1.5 billion maximum/minimum temperature, precipitation, snowfall, and snow depth values in GHCN-Daily as errors, has a false-positive rate of 1%?2%, and is effective at detecting both the grossest errors as well as more subtle inconsistencies among elements.
    • Download: (917.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comprehensive Automated Quality Assurance of Daily Surface Observations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4211750
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDurre, Imke
    contributor authorMenne, Matthew J.
    contributor authorGleason, Byron E.
    contributor authorHouston, Tamara G.
    contributor authorVose, Russell S.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:33:42Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:33:42Z
    date copyright2010/08/01
    date issued2010
    identifier issn1558-8424
    identifier otherams-70015.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4211750
    description abstractThis paper describes a comprehensive set of fully automated quality assurance (QA) procedures for observations of daily surface temperature, precipitation, snowfall, and snow depth. The QA procedures are being applied operationally to the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN)-Daily dataset. Since these data are used for analyzing and monitoring variations in extremes, the QA system is designed to detect as many errors as possible while maintaining a low probability of falsely identifying true meteorological events as erroneous. The system consists of 19 carefully evaluated tests that detect duplicate data, climatological outliers, and various inconsistencies (internal, temporal, and spatial). Manual review of random samples of the values flagged as errors is used to set the threshold for each procedure such that its false-positive rate, or fraction of valid values identified as errors, is minimized. In addition, the tests are arranged in a deliberate sequence in which the performance of the later checks is enhanced by the error detection capabilities of the earlier tests. Based on an assessment of each individual check and a final evaluation for each element, the system identifies 3.6 million (0.24%) of the more than 1.5 billion maximum/minimum temperature, precipitation, snowfall, and snow depth values in GHCN-Daily as errors, has a false-positive rate of 1%?2%, and is effective at detecting both the grossest errors as well as more subtle inconsistencies among elements.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComprehensive Automated Quality Assurance of Daily Surface Observations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume49
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    identifier doi10.1175/2010JAMC2375.1
    journal fristpage1615
    journal lastpage1633
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2010:;volume( 049 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian