Large-Eddy Simulations of a Drizzling, Stratocumulus-Topped Marine Boundary LayerSource: Monthly Weather Review:;2009:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 003::page 1083Author:Ackerman, Andrew S.
,
vanZanten, Margreet C.
,
Stevens, Bjorn
,
Savic-Jovcic, Verica
,
Bretherton, Christopher S.
,
Chlond, Andreas
,
Golaz, Jean-Christophe
,
Jiang, Hongli
,
Khairoutdinov, Marat
,
Krueger, Steven K.
,
Lewellen, David C.
,
Lock, Adrian
,
Moeng, Chin-Hoh
,
Nakamura, Kozo
,
Petters, Markus D.
,
Snider, Jefferson R.
,
Weinbrecht, Sonja
,
Zulauf, Mike
DOI: 10.1175/2008MWR2582.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: Cloud water sedimentation and drizzle in a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer are the focus of an intercomparison of large-eddy simulations. The context is an idealized case study of nocturnal stratocumulus under a dry inversion, with embedded pockets of heavily drizzling open cellular convection. Results from 11 groups are used. Two models resolve the size distributions of cloud particles, and the others parameterize cloud water sedimentation and drizzle. For the ensemble of simulations with drizzle and cloud water sedimentation, the mean liquid water path (LWP) is remarkably steady and consistent with the measurements, the mean entrainment rate is at the low end of the measured range, and the ensemble-average maximum vertical wind variance is roughly half that measured. On average, precipitation at the surface and at cloud base is smaller, and the rate of precipitation evaporation greater, than measured. Including drizzle in the simulations reduces convective intensity, increases boundary layer stratification, and decreases LWP for nearly all models. Including cloud water sedimentation substantially decreases entrainment, decreases convective intensity, and increases LWP for most models. In nearly all cases, LWP responds more strongly to cloud water sedimentation than to drizzle. The omission of cloud water sedimentation in simulations is strongly discouraged, regardless of whether or not precipitation is present below cloud base.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Ackerman, Andrew S. | |
contributor author | vanZanten, Margreet C. | |
contributor author | Stevens, Bjorn | |
contributor author | Savic-Jovcic, Verica | |
contributor author | Bretherton, Christopher S. | |
contributor author | Chlond, Andreas | |
contributor author | Golaz, Jean-Christophe | |
contributor author | Jiang, Hongli | |
contributor author | Khairoutdinov, Marat | |
contributor author | Krueger, Steven K. | |
contributor author | Lewellen, David C. | |
contributor author | Lock, Adrian | |
contributor author | Moeng, Chin-Hoh | |
contributor author | Nakamura, Kozo | |
contributor author | Petters, Markus D. | |
contributor author | Snider, Jefferson R. | |
contributor author | Weinbrecht, Sonja | |
contributor author | Zulauf, Mike | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:26:31Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:26:31Z | |
date copyright | 2009/03/01 | |
date issued | 2009 | |
identifier issn | 0027-0644 | |
identifier other | ams-67941.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4209443 | |
description abstract | Cloud water sedimentation and drizzle in a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer are the focus of an intercomparison of large-eddy simulations. The context is an idealized case study of nocturnal stratocumulus under a dry inversion, with embedded pockets of heavily drizzling open cellular convection. Results from 11 groups are used. Two models resolve the size distributions of cloud particles, and the others parameterize cloud water sedimentation and drizzle. For the ensemble of simulations with drizzle and cloud water sedimentation, the mean liquid water path (LWP) is remarkably steady and consistent with the measurements, the mean entrainment rate is at the low end of the measured range, and the ensemble-average maximum vertical wind variance is roughly half that measured. On average, precipitation at the surface and at cloud base is smaller, and the rate of precipitation evaporation greater, than measured. Including drizzle in the simulations reduces convective intensity, increases boundary layer stratification, and decreases LWP for nearly all models. Including cloud water sedimentation substantially decreases entrainment, decreases convective intensity, and increases LWP for most models. In nearly all cases, LWP responds more strongly to cloud water sedimentation than to drizzle. The omission of cloud water sedimentation in simulations is strongly discouraged, regardless of whether or not precipitation is present below cloud base. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Large-Eddy Simulations of a Drizzling, Stratocumulus-Topped Marine Boundary Layer | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 137 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Monthly Weather Review | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/2008MWR2582.1 | |
journal fristpage | 1083 | |
journal lastpage | 1110 | |
tree | Monthly Weather Review:;2009:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |