Show simple item record

contributor authorAckerman, Andrew S.
contributor authorvanZanten, Margreet C.
contributor authorStevens, Bjorn
contributor authorSavic-Jovcic, Verica
contributor authorBretherton, Christopher S.
contributor authorChlond, Andreas
contributor authorGolaz, Jean-Christophe
contributor authorJiang, Hongli
contributor authorKhairoutdinov, Marat
contributor authorKrueger, Steven K.
contributor authorLewellen, David C.
contributor authorLock, Adrian
contributor authorMoeng, Chin-Hoh
contributor authorNakamura, Kozo
contributor authorPetters, Markus D.
contributor authorSnider, Jefferson R.
contributor authorWeinbrecht, Sonja
contributor authorZulauf, Mike
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:26:31Z
date available2017-06-09T16:26:31Z
date copyright2009/03/01
date issued2009
identifier issn0027-0644
identifier otherams-67941.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4209443
description abstractCloud water sedimentation and drizzle in a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer are the focus of an intercomparison of large-eddy simulations. The context is an idealized case study of nocturnal stratocumulus under a dry inversion, with embedded pockets of heavily drizzling open cellular convection. Results from 11 groups are used. Two models resolve the size distributions of cloud particles, and the others parameterize cloud water sedimentation and drizzle. For the ensemble of simulations with drizzle and cloud water sedimentation, the mean liquid water path (LWP) is remarkably steady and consistent with the measurements, the mean entrainment rate is at the low end of the measured range, and the ensemble-average maximum vertical wind variance is roughly half that measured. On average, precipitation at the surface and at cloud base is smaller, and the rate of precipitation evaporation greater, than measured. Including drizzle in the simulations reduces convective intensity, increases boundary layer stratification, and decreases LWP for nearly all models. Including cloud water sedimentation substantially decreases entrainment, decreases convective intensity, and increases LWP for most models. In nearly all cases, LWP responds more strongly to cloud water sedimentation than to drizzle. The omission of cloud water sedimentation in simulations is strongly discouraged, regardless of whether or not precipitation is present below cloud base.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleLarge-Eddy Simulations of a Drizzling, Stratocumulus-Topped Marine Boundary Layer
typeJournal Paper
journal volume137
journal issue3
journal titleMonthly Weather Review
identifier doi10.1175/2008MWR2582.1
journal fristpage1083
journal lastpage1110
treeMonthly Weather Review:;2009:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record