The MAGS Water and Energy Budget StudySource: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2008:;Volume( 009 ):;issue: 001::page 96DOI: 10.1175/2007JHM810.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: This study represents the first attempt at developing a comprehensive climatology of atmospheric and surface water and energy budgets for the Mackenzie River basin (MRB). Different observed, remotely sensed, (re)analyzed, and modeled datasets were used to obtain independent estimates of the budgets. In particular, assimilated datasets, including the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Global Reanalysis 2 (NCEP-R2), the global 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Re-Analysis (ERA-40), the NCEP North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR), and the Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC) operational regional analysis as well as results from the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM) simulations, are used in the study. Apart from the development of state-of-the-art budget estimates for the MRB, the relative merits of current models, data assimilation systems, and global blended datasets in representing aspects of the water and energy cycle of this northern and data-sparse region were also assessed. In addition, the levels of uncertainty in assessing the budgets as well as their sources are discussed. The regional water budget for the MRB is closed within 10% of the observed runoff by using the moisture flux convergence from ERA-40, NARR, CMC, or CRCM. While these are noted improvements over previous water closure assessments for the region, magnitudes of the residuals in balancing the budgets are often comparable to the budget terms themselves in all the model and analysis datasets, and the spreads of budget estimates from the different datasets are also typically large, suggesting that substantial improvements to the models and observations are needed before the assessments of water and energy budgets for this northern region can be vastly improved.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Szeto, K. K. | |
| contributor author | Tran, H. | |
| contributor author | MacKay, M. D. | |
| contributor author | Crawford, R. | |
| contributor author | Stewart, R. E. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:19:55Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T16:19:55Z | |
| date copyright | 2008/02/01 | |
| date issued | 2008 | |
| identifier issn | 1525-755X | |
| identifier other | ams-65901.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4207176 | |
| description abstract | This study represents the first attempt at developing a comprehensive climatology of atmospheric and surface water and energy budgets for the Mackenzie River basin (MRB). Different observed, remotely sensed, (re)analyzed, and modeled datasets were used to obtain independent estimates of the budgets. In particular, assimilated datasets, including the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Global Reanalysis 2 (NCEP-R2), the global 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Re-Analysis (ERA-40), the NCEP North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR), and the Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC) operational regional analysis as well as results from the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM) simulations, are used in the study. Apart from the development of state-of-the-art budget estimates for the MRB, the relative merits of current models, data assimilation systems, and global blended datasets in representing aspects of the water and energy cycle of this northern and data-sparse region were also assessed. In addition, the levels of uncertainty in assessing the budgets as well as their sources are discussed. The regional water budget for the MRB is closed within 10% of the observed runoff by using the moisture flux convergence from ERA-40, NARR, CMC, or CRCM. While these are noted improvements over previous water closure assessments for the region, magnitudes of the residuals in balancing the budgets are often comparable to the budget terms themselves in all the model and analysis datasets, and the spreads of budget estimates from the different datasets are also typically large, suggesting that substantial improvements to the models and observations are needed before the assessments of water and energy budgets for this northern region can be vastly improved. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | The MAGS Water and Energy Budget Study | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 9 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Hydrometeorology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/2007JHM810.1 | |
| journal fristpage | 96 | |
| journal lastpage | 115 | |
| tree | Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2008:;Volume( 009 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |