Show simple item record

contributor authorSzeto, K. K.
contributor authorTran, H.
contributor authorMacKay, M. D.
contributor authorCrawford, R.
contributor authorStewart, R. E.
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:19:55Z
date available2017-06-09T16:19:55Z
date copyright2008/02/01
date issued2008
identifier issn1525-755X
identifier otherams-65901.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4207176
description abstractThis study represents the first attempt at developing a comprehensive climatology of atmospheric and surface water and energy budgets for the Mackenzie River basin (MRB). Different observed, remotely sensed, (re)analyzed, and modeled datasets were used to obtain independent estimates of the budgets. In particular, assimilated datasets, including the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Global Reanalysis 2 (NCEP-R2), the global 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Re-Analysis (ERA-40), the NCEP North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR), and the Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC) operational regional analysis as well as results from the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM) simulations, are used in the study. Apart from the development of state-of-the-art budget estimates for the MRB, the relative merits of current models, data assimilation systems, and global blended datasets in representing aspects of the water and energy cycle of this northern and data-sparse region were also assessed. In addition, the levels of uncertainty in assessing the budgets as well as their sources are discussed. The regional water budget for the MRB is closed within 10% of the observed runoff by using the moisture flux convergence from ERA-40, NARR, CMC, or CRCM. While these are noted improvements over previous water closure assessments for the region, magnitudes of the residuals in balancing the budgets are often comparable to the budget terms themselves in all the model and analysis datasets, and the spreads of budget estimates from the different datasets are also typically large, suggesting that substantial improvements to the models and observations are needed before the assessments of water and energy budgets for this northern region can be vastly improved.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleThe MAGS Water and Energy Budget Study
typeJournal Paper
journal volume9
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
identifier doi10.1175/2007JHM810.1
journal fristpage96
journal lastpage115
treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2008:;Volume( 009 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record