YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of Cloud-Phase Retrieval Methods for SEVIRI on Meteosat-8 Using Ground-Based Lidar and Cloud Radar Data

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2008:;volume( 047 ):;issue: 006::page 1723
    Author:
    Wolters, Erwin L. A.
    ,
    Roebeling, Robert A.
    ,
    Feijt, Arnout J.
    DOI: 10.1175/2007JAMC1591.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Three cloud-phase determination algorithms from passive satellite imagers are explored to assess their suitability for climate monitoring purposes in midlatitude coastal climate zones. The algorithms are the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-like thermal infrared cloud-phase method, the Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring (CM-SAF) method, and an International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP)-like method. Using one year (May 2004?April 2005) of data from the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) on the first Meteosat Second Generation satellite (Meteosat-8), retrievals of the methods are compared with collocated and synchronized ground-based cloud-phase retrievals obtained from cloud radar and lidar observations at Cabauw, Netherlands. Three aspects of the satellite retrievals are evaluated: 1) instantaneous cloud-phase retrievals, 2) monthly-averaged water and ice cloud occurrence frequency, and 3) diurnal cycle of cloud phase for May?August 2004. For the instantaneous cases, all methods have a very small bias for thick water and ice cloud retrievals (?5%). The ISCCP-like method has a larger bias for pure water clouds (?10%), which is likely due to the 260-K threshold leading to misdetection of water clouds existing at lower temperatures. For the monthly-averaged water and ice cloud occurrence, the CM-SAF method is best capable of reproducing the annual cycle, mainly for the water cloud occurrence frequency, for which an almost constant positive bias of ?8% was found. The ISCCP- and MODIS-like methods have more problems in detecting the annual cycle, especially during the winter months. The difference in annual cycle detection among the three methods is most probably related to the use of visible/near-infrared reflectances that enable a more direct observation of cloud phase. The diurnal cycle in cloud phase is reproduced well by all methods. The MODIS-like method reproduces the diurnal cycle best, with correlations of 0.89 and 0.86 for water and ice cloud occurrence frequency, respectively.
    • Download: (1.150Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of Cloud-Phase Retrieval Methods for SEVIRI on Meteosat-8 Using Ground-Based Lidar and Cloud Radar Data

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4206542
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWolters, Erwin L. A.
    contributor authorRoebeling, Robert A.
    contributor authorFeijt, Arnout J.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:18:08Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:18:08Z
    date copyright2008/06/01
    date issued2008
    identifier issn1558-8424
    identifier otherams-65329.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4206542
    description abstractThree cloud-phase determination algorithms from passive satellite imagers are explored to assess their suitability for climate monitoring purposes in midlatitude coastal climate zones. The algorithms are the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-like thermal infrared cloud-phase method, the Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring (CM-SAF) method, and an International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP)-like method. Using one year (May 2004?April 2005) of data from the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) on the first Meteosat Second Generation satellite (Meteosat-8), retrievals of the methods are compared with collocated and synchronized ground-based cloud-phase retrievals obtained from cloud radar and lidar observations at Cabauw, Netherlands. Three aspects of the satellite retrievals are evaluated: 1) instantaneous cloud-phase retrievals, 2) monthly-averaged water and ice cloud occurrence frequency, and 3) diurnal cycle of cloud phase for May?August 2004. For the instantaneous cases, all methods have a very small bias for thick water and ice cloud retrievals (?5%). The ISCCP-like method has a larger bias for pure water clouds (?10%), which is likely due to the 260-K threshold leading to misdetection of water clouds existing at lower temperatures. For the monthly-averaged water and ice cloud occurrence, the CM-SAF method is best capable of reproducing the annual cycle, mainly for the water cloud occurrence frequency, for which an almost constant positive bias of ?8% was found. The ISCCP- and MODIS-like methods have more problems in detecting the annual cycle, especially during the winter months. The difference in annual cycle detection among the three methods is most probably related to the use of visible/near-infrared reflectances that enable a more direct observation of cloud phase. The diurnal cycle in cloud phase is reproduced well by all methods. The MODIS-like method reproduces the diurnal cycle best, with correlations of 0.89 and 0.86 for water and ice cloud occurrence frequency, respectively.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleEvaluation of Cloud-Phase Retrieval Methods for SEVIRI on Meteosat-8 Using Ground-Based Lidar and Cloud Radar Data
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume47
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    identifier doi10.1175/2007JAMC1591.1
    journal fristpage1723
    journal lastpage1738
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2008:;volume( 047 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian