YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Urban Dispersion Modeling: Comparison with Single-Building Measurements

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2007:;volume( 046 ):;issue: 012::page 2180
    Author:
    Diehl, Steve R.
    ,
    Burrows, Donald A.
    ,
    Hendricks, Eric A.
    ,
    Keith, Robert
    DOI: 10.1175/2006JAMC1300.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Two models have been developed to predict airflow and dispersion in urban environments. The first model, the Realistic Urban Spread and Transport of Intrusive Contaminants (RUSTIC) model, is a fast-running urban airflow code that rapidly converges to a numerical solution of a modified set of the compressible Navier?Stokes equations. RUSTIC uses the k?? turbulence model with a buoyancy production term to handle atmospheric stability effects. The second model, ?MESO,? is a Lagrangian particle transport and dispersion code that predicts concentrations of a released chemical or biological agent in urban or rural areas. As a preliminary validation of the models, concentrations simulated by MESO are compared with experimental data from wind-tunnel testing of dispersion around both a multistory rectangular building and a single-story L-shaped building. For the rectangular building, trace gas is forced out at the base of the downwind side, whereas for the L-shaped building, trace gas is forced out of a side door in the inner corner of the ?L.? The MESO?RUSTIC combination is set up with the initial conditions of the wind-tunnel experiment, and the steady-state concentrations simulated by the models are compared with the wind-tunnel data. For the multistory building, a dense set of detector locations was available downwind at ground level. For the L-shaped building, concentration data were available at three heights in a lateral plane at a distance of one building height downwind of the lee side. A favorable comparison between model simulations and test data is shown for both buildings.
    • Download: (1.604Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Urban Dispersion Modeling: Comparison with Single-Building Measurements

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4206430
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDiehl, Steve R.
    contributor authorBurrows, Donald A.
    contributor authorHendricks, Eric A.
    contributor authorKeith, Robert
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:17:47Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:17:47Z
    date copyright2007/12/01
    date issued2007
    identifier issn1558-8424
    identifier otherams-65228.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4206430
    description abstractTwo models have been developed to predict airflow and dispersion in urban environments. The first model, the Realistic Urban Spread and Transport of Intrusive Contaminants (RUSTIC) model, is a fast-running urban airflow code that rapidly converges to a numerical solution of a modified set of the compressible Navier?Stokes equations. RUSTIC uses the k?? turbulence model with a buoyancy production term to handle atmospheric stability effects. The second model, ?MESO,? is a Lagrangian particle transport and dispersion code that predicts concentrations of a released chemical or biological agent in urban or rural areas. As a preliminary validation of the models, concentrations simulated by MESO are compared with experimental data from wind-tunnel testing of dispersion around both a multistory rectangular building and a single-story L-shaped building. For the rectangular building, trace gas is forced out at the base of the downwind side, whereas for the L-shaped building, trace gas is forced out of a side door in the inner corner of the ?L.? The MESO?RUSTIC combination is set up with the initial conditions of the wind-tunnel experiment, and the steady-state concentrations simulated by the models are compared with the wind-tunnel data. For the multistory building, a dense set of detector locations was available downwind at ground level. For the L-shaped building, concentration data were available at three heights in a lateral plane at a distance of one building height downwind of the lee side. A favorable comparison between model simulations and test data is shown for both buildings.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleUrban Dispersion Modeling: Comparison with Single-Building Measurements
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume46
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    identifier doi10.1175/2006JAMC1300.1
    journal fristpage2180
    journal lastpage2191
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2007:;volume( 046 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian