Philosophy of Climate ScienceSource: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2000:;volume( 081 ):;issue: 002::page 265Author:Petersen, Arthur C.
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<0265:POCS>2.3.CO;2Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: The use of climate simulations in scientific assessments of climate change and in the formulation of climatechange scenarios has been contested for, among others, methodological reasons. The "philosophy of climate science"encompasses discussions about the methodology of climate science. Three issues with respect to climate simulation arediscussed: (i) model hierarchy and complexity, (ii) tuning and falsifiability, and (iii) uncertainty. In this discussion paperit is argued that high?resolution and low?resolution climate models have complementary roles to play in the scienceof climate change. The role of computer simulations in climate science deserves further philosophical study in orderto better assess their quality for informing climate policy making.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Petersen, Arthur C. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T14:42:32Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T14:42:32Z | |
| date copyright | 2000/02/01 | |
| date issued | 2000 | |
| identifier issn | 0003-0007 | |
| identifier other | ams-24930.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4161657 | |
| description abstract | The use of climate simulations in scientific assessments of climate change and in the formulation of climatechange scenarios has been contested for, among others, methodological reasons. The "philosophy of climate science"encompasses discussions about the methodology of climate science. Three issues with respect to climate simulation arediscussed: (i) model hierarchy and complexity, (ii) tuning and falsifiability, and (iii) uncertainty. In this discussion paperit is argued that high?resolution and low?resolution climate models have complementary roles to play in the scienceof climate change. The role of computer simulations in climate science deserves further philosophical study in orderto better assess their quality for informing climate policy making. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | Philosophy of Climate Science | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 81 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<0265:POCS>2.3.CO;2 | |
| journal fristpage | 265 | |
| journal lastpage | 271 | |
| tree | Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2000:;volume( 081 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |