Show simple item record

contributor authorPetersen, Arthur C.
date accessioned2017-06-09T14:42:32Z
date available2017-06-09T14:42:32Z
date copyright2000/02/01
date issued2000
identifier issn0003-0007
identifier otherams-24930.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4161657
description abstractThe use of climate simulations in scientific assessments of climate change and in the formulation of climatechange scenarios has been contested for, among others, methodological reasons. The "philosophy of climate science"encompasses discussions about the methodology of climate science. Three issues with respect to climate simulation arediscussed: (i) model hierarchy and complexity, (ii) tuning and falsifiability, and (iii) uncertainty. In this discussion paperit is argued that high?resolution and low?resolution climate models have complementary roles to play in the scienceof climate change. The role of computer simulations in climate science deserves further philosophical study in orderto better assess their quality for informing climate policy making.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titlePhilosophy of Climate Science
typeJournal Paper
journal volume81
journal issue2
journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
identifier doi10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<0265:POCS>2.3.CO;2
journal fristpage265
journal lastpage271
treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2000:;volume( 081 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record