YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Urban Planning and Development
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Urban Planning and Development
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Planning Education: Let's Forget It for Civil Engineers

    Source: Journal of Urban Planning and Development:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Richard W. Lyles
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1987)113:2(61)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Civil engineers interact with planners at various levels and should, arguably, have some formal training in that discipline. The arguments against such formal training are: (1) Today's civil engineering students are regularly being exposed to broader viewpoints and there is no explicit need for courses in planning; (2) few civil engineering programs could offer a planning course per se; and (3) or most, the differences between planning and civil engineering are distinct and should be maintained. In summary, another discipline's educational task should not be usurped; planning educators should teach planning to the planners and to the engineers who would be both, while engineering educators should teach engineering to the engineers and to the planners who would be both.
    • Download: (423.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Planning Education: Let's Forget It for Civil Engineers

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/38222
    Collections
    • Journal of Urban Planning and Development

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRichard W. Lyles
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:05:23Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:05:23Z
    date copyrightNovember 1987
    date issued1987
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9488%281987%29113%3A2%2861%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/38222
    description abstractCivil engineers interact with planners at various levels and should, arguably, have some formal training in that discipline. The arguments against such formal training are: (1) Today's civil engineering students are regularly being exposed to broader viewpoints and there is no explicit need for courses in planning; (2) few civil engineering programs could offer a planning course per se; and (3) or most, the differences between planning and civil engineering are distinct and should be maintained. In summary, another discipline's educational task should not be usurped; planning educators should teach planning to the planners and to the engineers who would be both, while engineering educators should teach engineering to the engineers and to the planners who would be both.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePlanning Education: Let's Forget It for Civil Engineers
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume113
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1987)113:2(61)
    treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian