Show simple item record

contributor authorRichard W. Lyles
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:05:23Z
date available2017-05-08T21:05:23Z
date copyrightNovember 1987
date issued1987
identifier other%28asce%290733-9488%281987%29113%3A2%2861%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/38222
description abstractCivil engineers interact with planners at various levels and should, arguably, have some formal training in that discipline. The arguments against such formal training are: (1) Today's civil engineering students are regularly being exposed to broader viewpoints and there is no explicit need for courses in planning; (2) few civil engineering programs could offer a planning course per se; and (3) or most, the differences between planning and civil engineering are distinct and should be maintained. In summary, another discipline's educational task should not be usurped; planning educators should teach planning to the planners and to the engineers who would be both, while engineering educators should teach engineering to the engineers and to the planners who would be both.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePlanning Education: Let's Forget It for Civil Engineers
typeJournal Paper
journal volume113
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1987)113:2(61)
treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record