Distortional Buckling Tests on Cold-Formed Steel BeamsSource: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 004DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:4(515)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: Failure in cold-formed steel beams is generally initiated by one of three instabilities: local, distortional, or lateral-torsional buckling. For cold-formed steel joists, purlins, or girts, when the compression flange is not restrained by attachment to sheathing or paneling, distortional buckling may be the predominant failure mode. Experimental results on cold-formed steel beams with unrestrained compression flanges are scarce. Therefore a series of distortional buckling tests on cold-formed steel C and Z sections in bending was conducted to establish the capacity in distortional buckling failures. Test details were selected to allow distortional buckling to form, but restrict lateral-torsional buckling to the extent possible. These distortional buckling tests also provide a direct comparison against the local buckling tests previously performed by the writers. As expected, large strength reductions are observed in the tested specimens when distortional buckling initiated the failure instead of local buckling. U.S., Canadian, and joint North American standards for design, which are known to primarily focus on local buckling, provided unconservative predictions of the observed strength. The Australian/New Zealand Standard and the direct strength method, which provide explicit methods for calculating the capacity in the distortional buckling mode, provided reasonably accurate and reliable predictions.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Cheng Yu | |
contributor author | Benjamin W. Schafer | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:59:47Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T20:59:47Z | |
date copyright | April 2006 | |
date issued | 2006 | |
identifier other | %28asce%290733-9445%282006%29132%3A4%28515%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/34767 | |
description abstract | Failure in cold-formed steel beams is generally initiated by one of three instabilities: local, distortional, or lateral-torsional buckling. For cold-formed steel joists, purlins, or girts, when the compression flange is not restrained by attachment to sheathing or paneling, distortional buckling may be the predominant failure mode. Experimental results on cold-formed steel beams with unrestrained compression flanges are scarce. Therefore a series of distortional buckling tests on cold-formed steel C and Z sections in bending was conducted to establish the capacity in distortional buckling failures. Test details were selected to allow distortional buckling to form, but restrict lateral-torsional buckling to the extent possible. These distortional buckling tests also provide a direct comparison against the local buckling tests previously performed by the writers. As expected, large strength reductions are observed in the tested specimens when distortional buckling initiated the failure instead of local buckling. U.S., Canadian, and joint North American standards for design, which are known to primarily focus on local buckling, provided unconservative predictions of the observed strength. The Australian/New Zealand Standard and the direct strength method, which provide explicit methods for calculating the capacity in the distortional buckling mode, provided reasonably accurate and reliable predictions. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Distortional Buckling Tests on Cold-Formed Steel Beams | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 132 | |
journal issue | 4 | |
journal title | Journal of Structural Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:4(515) | |
tree | Journal of Structural Engineering:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 004 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |