| description abstract | Failure in cold-formed steel beams is generally initiated by one of three instabilities: local, distortional, or lateral-torsional buckling. For cold-formed steel joists, purlins, or girts, when the compression flange is not restrained by attachment to sheathing or paneling, distortional buckling may be the predominant failure mode. Experimental results on cold-formed steel beams with unrestrained compression flanges are scarce. Therefore a series of distortional buckling tests on cold-formed steel C and Z sections in bending was conducted to establish the capacity in distortional buckling failures. Test details were selected to allow distortional buckling to form, but restrict lateral-torsional buckling to the extent possible. These distortional buckling tests also provide a direct comparison against the local buckling tests previously performed by the writers. As expected, large strength reductions are observed in the tested specimens when distortional buckling initiated the failure instead of local buckling. U.S., Canadian, and joint North American standards for design, which are known to primarily focus on local buckling, provided unconservative predictions of the observed strength. The Australian/New Zealand Standard and the direct strength method, which provide explicit methods for calculating the capacity in the distortional buckling mode, provided reasonably accurate and reliable predictions. | |
