Assessment of Safety Performance Measures at Construction SitesSource: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 004DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1986)112:4(530)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: Various methods for the measurement and classification of safety performance at construction sites, e.g., timing relative to the moment of accident, data collection method, safety effectiveness criterion, performance measure, and frequency and severity of the measured event, are analyzed. The effectiveness of the various methods and the extent of their use at construction sites are examined. Attributes that are investigated include efficiency, reliability, and validity and diagnostic capacity of the measure in order to identify the cause for success or failure, respectively, of the safety program at a site. The data for the study were collected through questionnaires which were addressed to the largest construction companies in the United States. The most effective and the most widely employed measurement methods were lost‐day cases, doctor's cases, and cost of accidents. The least effective and most limited in use were the no‐injury cases.
|
Show full item record
contributor author | Alexander Laufer | |
contributor author | William B. Ledbetter | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:47:42Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T20:47:42Z | |
date copyright | December 1986 | |
date issued | 1986 | |
identifier other | %28asce%290733-9364%281986%29112%3A4%28530%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/27397 | |
description abstract | Various methods for the measurement and classification of safety performance at construction sites, e.g., timing relative to the moment of accident, data collection method, safety effectiveness criterion, performance measure, and frequency and severity of the measured event, are analyzed. The effectiveness of the various methods and the extent of their use at construction sites are examined. Attributes that are investigated include efficiency, reliability, and validity and diagnostic capacity of the measure in order to identify the cause for success or failure, respectively, of the safety program at a site. The data for the study were collected through questionnaires which were addressed to the largest construction companies in the United States. The most effective and the most widely employed measurement methods were lost‐day cases, doctor's cases, and cost of accidents. The least effective and most limited in use were the no‐injury cases. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Assessment of Safety Performance Measures at Construction Sites | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 112 | |
journal issue | 4 | |
journal title | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1986)112:4(530) | |
tree | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 004 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |