Show simple item record

contributor authorAlexander Laufer
contributor authorWilliam B. Ledbetter
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:47:42Z
date available2017-05-08T20:47:42Z
date copyrightDecember 1986
date issued1986
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281986%29112%3A4%28530%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/27397
description abstractVarious methods for the measurement and classification of safety performance at construction sites, e.g., timing relative to the moment of accident, data collection method, safety effectiveness criterion, performance measure, and frequency and severity of the measured event, are analyzed. The effectiveness of the various methods and the extent of their use at construction sites are examined. Attributes that are investigated include efficiency, reliability, and validity and diagnostic capacity of the measure in order to identify the cause for success or failure, respectively, of the safety program at a site. The data for the study were collected through questionnaires which were addressed to the largest construction companies in the United States. The most effective and the most widely employed measurement methods were lost‐day cases, doctor's cases, and cost of accidents. The least effective and most limited in use were the no‐injury cases.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAssessment of Safety Performance Measures at Construction Sites
typeJournal Paper
journal volume112
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1986)112:4(530)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record