YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Hybrid Noninertia and Statistical Model versus Hydrodynamic Routing

    Source: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Hussam E. S. Fahmy
    ,
    Hubert J. Morel‐Seytoux
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1994)120:6(706)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: A new flood‐routing method is compared with the DWOPER model. The new method combines a noninertia (or diffusion model) simplification of the de Saint Venant equation with a statistical procedure. It accounts for the nonlinearity and dispersion of the flood‐wave propagation phenomenon. It also accounts for nonuniform lateral flow. The new method, unlike most hydrologic routing methods, can be used to simulate a variety of flow variables such as water stage, depth, or discharge. The comparison is not only based on the accuracy of both models, but also, and mostly, on their practicality. Both models are compared for accuracy and in aspects such as data requirement, computer running time, actual time needed for calibration.
    • Download: (763.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Hybrid Noninertia and Statistical Model versus Hydrodynamic Routing

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/23991
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHussam E. S. Fahmy
    contributor authorHubert J. Morel‐Seytoux
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:42:05Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:42:05Z
    date copyrightJune 1994
    date issued1994
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281994%29120%3A6%28706%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23991
    description abstractA new flood‐routing method is compared with the DWOPER model. The new method combines a noninertia (or diffusion model) simplification of the de Saint Venant equation with a statistical procedure. It accounts for the nonlinearity and dispersion of the flood‐wave propagation phenomenon. It also accounts for nonuniform lateral flow. The new method, unlike most hydrologic routing methods, can be used to simulate a variety of flow variables such as water stage, depth, or discharge. The comparison is not only based on the accuracy of both models, but also, and mostly, on their practicality. Both models are compared for accuracy and in aspects such as data requirement, computer running time, actual time needed for calibration.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleHybrid Noninertia and Statistical Model versus Hydrodynamic Routing
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume120
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1994)120:6(706)
    treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian