Show simple item record

contributor authorHussam E. S. Fahmy
contributor authorHubert J. Morel‐Seytoux
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:42:05Z
date available2017-05-08T20:42:05Z
date copyrightJune 1994
date issued1994
identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281994%29120%3A6%28706%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23991
description abstractA new flood‐routing method is compared with the DWOPER model. The new method combines a noninertia (or diffusion model) simplification of the de Saint Venant equation with a statistical procedure. It accounts for the nonlinearity and dispersion of the flood‐wave propagation phenomenon. It also accounts for nonuniform lateral flow. The new method, unlike most hydrologic routing methods, can be used to simulate a variety of flow variables such as water stage, depth, or discharge. The comparison is not only based on the accuracy of both models, but also, and mostly, on their practicality. Both models are compared for accuracy and in aspects such as data requirement, computer running time, actual time needed for calibration.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleHybrid Noninertia and Statistical Model versus Hydrodynamic Routing
typeJournal Paper
journal volume120
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1994)120:6(706)
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record