| contributor author | Keh‐Chia Yeh | |
| contributor author | Yeou‐Koung Tung | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:41:44Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:41:44Z | |
| date copyright | February 1993 | |
| date issued | 1993 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9429%281993%29119%3A2%28262%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23783 | |
| description abstract | Sand and gravel raining from a river bed results in irregular pits on the river bed. The migration of the pits might potentially threaten the safety of downstream bridge piers and other in‐stream hydraulic structures. Models were developed to simulate the movement of pits for predicting the effect of migrating pits on in‐stream structures. In view of random characteristics inherently residing in hydraulic and hydrologic processes, it is essential for an engineer to assess the overall uncertainty features of a hydraulic model output subjected to its stochastic input parameters. As an illustration, this paper analyzes the uncertainties of a pit migration model recently proposed by Lee et al. (1990) using three methods including the first‐order variance estimation method, point estimation technique, and Latin hypercubic sampling. Comparisons of merits and limitations of these methods are also made. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses of Pit‐Migration Model | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 119 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Hydraulic Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:2(262) | |
| tree | Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |