Show simple item record

contributor authorKeh‐Chia Yeh
contributor authorYeou‐Koung Tung
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:41:44Z
date available2017-05-08T20:41:44Z
date copyrightFebruary 1993
date issued1993
identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281993%29119%3A2%28262%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23783
description abstractSand and gravel raining from a river bed results in irregular pits on the river bed. The migration of the pits might potentially threaten the safety of downstream bridge piers and other in‐stream hydraulic structures. Models were developed to simulate the movement of pits for predicting the effect of migrating pits on in‐stream structures. In view of random characteristics inherently residing in hydraulic and hydrologic processes, it is essential for an engineer to assess the overall uncertainty features of a hydraulic model output subjected to its stochastic input parameters. As an illustration, this paper analyzes the uncertainties of a pit migration model recently proposed by Lee et al. (1990) using three methods including the first‐order variance estimation method, point estimation technique, and Latin hypercubic sampling. Comparisons of merits and limitations of these methods are also made.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleUncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses of Pit‐Migration Model
typeJournal Paper
journal volume119
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:2(262)
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record