YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Laboratory-Based Productivity Study on Alternative Masonry Systems

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2003:;Volume ( 129 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    K. B. Anand
    ,
    K. Ramamurthy
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:3(237)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Masonry construction over the last century has undergone radical changes that have led to specific improvements in construction performance due to the advent of large-sized blocks, innovative methods like surface-bonded masonry, partially grouted masonry, and dry-stacked/mortarless masonry using interlocking blocks. This paper outlines relative productivity assessment of conventional and interlocking-block masonry with different construction methods. To measure the utilization of time by the members of the team, work sampling (adopting the 5 min rating technique) was used. The frequencies of occurrences of each work category, namely direct, indirect, and noncontributory, have been established. Due to the variation in the noncontributory work component for different methods of construction, the net output has been expressed as output per productive hour. Productivity enhancement of 80–120% was observed for dry-stacked masonry and 60–90% more for thin-jointed and mortar-bedded interlocking-block masonry than that of conventional masonry.
    • Download: (64.45Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Laboratory-Based Productivity Study on Alternative Masonry Systems

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/20898
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorK. B. Anand
    contributor authorK. Ramamurthy
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:36:12Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:36:12Z
    date copyrightJune 2003
    date issued2003
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%282003%29129%3A3%28237%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/20898
    description abstractMasonry construction over the last century has undergone radical changes that have led to specific improvements in construction performance due to the advent of large-sized blocks, innovative methods like surface-bonded masonry, partially grouted masonry, and dry-stacked/mortarless masonry using interlocking blocks. This paper outlines relative productivity assessment of conventional and interlocking-block masonry with different construction methods. To measure the utilization of time by the members of the team, work sampling (adopting the 5 min rating technique) was used. The frequencies of occurrences of each work category, namely direct, indirect, and noncontributory, have been established. Due to the variation in the noncontributory work component for different methods of construction, the net output has been expressed as output per productive hour. Productivity enhancement of 80–120% was observed for dry-stacked masonry and 60–90% more for thin-jointed and mortar-bedded interlocking-block masonry than that of conventional masonry.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleLaboratory-Based Productivity Study on Alternative Masonry Systems
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume129
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:3(237)
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2003:;Volume ( 129 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian