Show simple item record

contributor authorK. B. Anand
contributor authorK. Ramamurthy
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:36:12Z
date available2017-05-08T20:36:12Z
date copyrightJune 2003
date issued2003
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%282003%29129%3A3%28237%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/20898
description abstractMasonry construction over the last century has undergone radical changes that have led to specific improvements in construction performance due to the advent of large-sized blocks, innovative methods like surface-bonded masonry, partially grouted masonry, and dry-stacked/mortarless masonry using interlocking blocks. This paper outlines relative productivity assessment of conventional and interlocking-block masonry with different construction methods. To measure the utilization of time by the members of the team, work sampling (adopting the 5 min rating technique) was used. The frequencies of occurrences of each work category, namely direct, indirect, and noncontributory, have been established. Due to the variation in the noncontributory work component for different methods of construction, the net output has been expressed as output per productive hour. Productivity enhancement of 80–120% was observed for dry-stacked masonry and 60–90% more for thin-jointed and mortar-bedded interlocking-block masonry than that of conventional masonry.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLaboratory-Based Productivity Study on Alternative Masonry Systems
typeJournal Paper
journal volume129
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:3(237)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2003:;Volume ( 129 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record