Pressure-Vessel Steels: Promise and ProblemSource: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1974:;volume( 096 ):;issue: 001::page 9Author:J. H. Gross 
DOI: 10.1115/1.3454147Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: During  the  past  25  years,  numerous  pressure-vessel  problems  have  been  solved,  but  in  many  instances  the  solutions  have  led  to  other  problems.  Currently,  promising  developments  in  pressure-vessel  steels  are  providing  such  solutions  and  such  additional  problems  with  respect  to  fabrication  and  various  failure  modes.  With  respect  to  fabrication,  lamellar  tearing  is  being  minimized  by  special  melting  and  solidification  practices.  However,  continuous  casting  and  electroslag-remelting  of  slabs  are  currently  limited  in  plate  size  that  can  be  produced.  With  respect  to  bursting,  recent  studies  indicate  that  high-yield-strength  steels  have  higher  burst-strength  indices  than  lower-strength  steels  even  for  vessels  with  nozzles  and  with  notches  up  to  25  percent  of  the  wall  thickness.  Strength  and  therefore  resistance  to  bursting  can  be  increased  without  loss  in  toughness  through  new  control-rolling  practices,  except  that  these  practices  are  limited  to  plates  up  to  3/4  in.  thick.  New  high-toughness  line-pipe  steels  are  now  available  that  should  be  very  attractive  for  pressure  vessels  that  require  very  high  resistance  to  shear  tearing.  These  low-sulfur  steels  may  be  somewhat  impaired  by  sensitivity  to  splitting  as  a  result  of  the  control-rolling  practice.  To  date,  steels  have  not  been  developed  with  improved  resistance  to  fatigue  failure.  Fortunately,  pressure  vessels  have  rarely  failed  by  fatigue.  Similarly,  resistance  to  failure  by  environmental  effects  is  not  basically  improved  by  steel  composition.  This  is  usually  the  result  of  difficulty  in  defining  the  effects  of  the  numerous  environments  that  may  be  involved.  These  steel  developments  promise  continued  improvement  of  pressure-vessel  performance,  but  usually  are  accompanied  by  problems  that  present  new  technological  challenges.
 
keyword(s): Pressure vessels , Steel , Electrical resistance , Failure , Manufacturing , Toughness , Vessels , Wall thickness , Fatigue failure , Fatigue , Casting , Slabs , Melting , Shear (Mechanics) , Nozzles , Pipes , Plates (structures) , Solidification AND Sulfur ,
  | 
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | J. H. Gross | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:38:57Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:38:57Z | |
| date copyright | February, 1974 | |
| date issued | 1974 | |
| identifier issn | 0094-9930 | |
| identifier other | JPVTAS-28104#9_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/165222 | |
| description abstract | During the past 25 years, numerous pressure-vessel problems have been solved, but in many instances the solutions have led to other problems. Currently, promising developments in pressure-vessel steels are providing such solutions and such additional problems with respect to fabrication and various failure modes. With respect to fabrication, lamellar tearing is being minimized by special melting and solidification practices. However, continuous casting and electroslag-remelting of slabs are currently limited in plate size that can be produced. With respect to bursting, recent studies indicate that high-yield-strength steels have higher burst-strength indices than lower-strength steels even for vessels with nozzles and with notches up to 25 percent of the wall thickness. Strength and therefore resistance to bursting can be increased without loss in toughness through new control-rolling practices, except that these practices are limited to plates up to 3/4 in. thick. New high-toughness line-pipe steels are now available that should be very attractive for pressure vessels that require very high resistance to shear tearing. These low-sulfur steels may be somewhat impaired by sensitivity to splitting as a result of the control-rolling practice. To date, steels have not been developed with improved resistance to fatigue failure. Fortunately, pressure vessels have rarely failed by fatigue. Similarly, resistance to failure by environmental effects is not basically improved by steel composition. This is usually the result of difficulty in defining the effects of the numerous environments that may be involved. These steel developments promise continued improvement of pressure-vessel performance, but usually are accompanied by problems that present new technological challenges. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Pressure-Vessel Steels: Promise and Problem | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 96 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3454147 | |
| journal fristpage | 9 | |
| journal lastpage | 14 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8978 | |
| keywords | Pressure vessels | |
| keywords | Steel | |
| keywords | Electrical resistance | |
| keywords | Failure | |
| keywords | Manufacturing | |
| keywords | Toughness | |
| keywords | Vessels | |
| keywords | Wall thickness | |
| keywords | Fatigue failure | |
| keywords | Fatigue | |
| keywords | Casting | |
| keywords | Slabs | |
| keywords | Melting | |
| keywords | Shear (Mechanics) | |
| keywords | Nozzles | |
| keywords | Pipes | |
| keywords | Plates (structures) | |
| keywords | Solidification AND Sulfur | |
| tree | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1974:;volume( 096 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |