An Evaluation of the Jenike Bunker Design MethodSource: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1973:;volume( 095 ):;issue: 001::page 48Author:H. Wright
DOI: 10.1115/1.3438155Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Flow blockage in steelworks bunkers is a major source of trouble. The correct design of bunkers to ensure flow would result in reduced capital and operating costs. The Jenike method of bunker design, which claims a solution to this problem, has been critically examined for a range of iron ores using a variable-geometry wedge-shaped bunker. The main conclusion from these experiments is that the Jenike method is valid for dynamic pressure conditions and even shows some over-design. Further experiments using just one iron ore have confirmed the validity for a conical-shaped bunker under similar pressure conditions. The main limitations of the Jenike design method are as follows: (a) It does not provide a design which can accommodate impact filling. In certain cases, especially with conical bunkers, flow blockage can easily occur and (b) It does not provide a design which can be certain of eliminating arching at the transition point of a bunker with surcharge.
keyword(s): Design methodology , Design , Flow (Dynamics) , Pressure , Iron , Wedges , Geometry AND Iron and steel mill construction ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | H. Wright | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:36:59Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:36:59Z | |
| date copyright | February, 1973 | |
| date issued | 1973 | |
| identifier issn | 1087-1357 | |
| identifier other | JMSEFK-27583#48_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/164099 | |
| description abstract | Flow blockage in steelworks bunkers is a major source of trouble. The correct design of bunkers to ensure flow would result in reduced capital and operating costs. The Jenike method of bunker design, which claims a solution to this problem, has been critically examined for a range of iron ores using a variable-geometry wedge-shaped bunker. The main conclusion from these experiments is that the Jenike method is valid for dynamic pressure conditions and even shows some over-design. Further experiments using just one iron ore have confirmed the validity for a conical-shaped bunker under similar pressure conditions. The main limitations of the Jenike design method are as follows: (a) It does not provide a design which can accommodate impact filling. In certain cases, especially with conical bunkers, flow blockage can easily occur and (b) It does not provide a design which can be certain of eliminating arching at the transition point of a bunker with surcharge. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | An Evaluation of the Jenike Bunker Design Method | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 95 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3438155 | |
| journal fristpage | 48 | |
| journal lastpage | 54 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8935 | |
| keywords | Design methodology | |
| keywords | Design | |
| keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
| keywords | Pressure | |
| keywords | Iron | |
| keywords | Wedges | |
| keywords | Geometry AND Iron and steel mill construction | |
| tree | Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1973:;volume( 095 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |