| contributor author | A. J. Wheeler | |
| contributor author | J. P. Johnston | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:36:33Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:36:33Z | |
| date copyright | September, 1973 | |
| date issued | 1973 | |
| identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
| identifier other | JFEGA4-26849#415_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/163878 | |
| description abstract | Predictions have been made for a variety of experimental three-dimensional boundary layer flows with a single finite difference method which was used with three different turbulent stress models: (i) an eddy viscosity model, (ii) the “Nash” model, and (iii) the “Bradshaw” model. For many purposes, even the simplest stress model (eddy viscosity) was adequate to predict the mean velocity field. On the other hand, the profile of shear stress direction was not correctly predicted in one case by any model tested. The high sensitivity of the predicted results to free stream pressure gradient in separating flow cases is demonstrated. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | An Assessment of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layer Prediction Methods | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 95 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3447045 | |
| journal fristpage | 415 | |
| journal lastpage | 421 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-901X | |
| keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
| keywords | Turbulence | |
| keywords | Eddies (Fluid dynamics) | |
| keywords | Viscosity | |
| keywords | Stress | |
| keywords | Shear (Mechanics) | |
| keywords | Boundary layers | |
| keywords | Boundary layer turbulence | |
| keywords | Finite difference methods AND Pressure gradient | |
| tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1973:;volume( 095 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |