Show simple item record

contributor authorHo, Clifford K.
contributor authorCarlson, Matthew
contributor authorGarg, Pardeep
contributor authorKumar, Pramod
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:33:08Z
date available2017-05-09T01:33:08Z
date issued2016
identifier issn0199-6231
identifier othermats_138_04_041001.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/162486
description abstractThis paper evaluates cost and performance tradeoffs of alternative supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) closedloop Brayton cycle configurations with a concentrated solar heat source. Alternative sCO2 power cycle configurations include simple, recompression, cascaded, and partial cooling cycles. Results show that the simple closedloop Brayton cycle yielded the lowest powerblock component costs while allowing variable temperature differentials across the sCO2 heating source, depending on the level of recuperation. Lower temperature differentials led to higher sensible storage costs, but cycle configurations with lower temperature differentials (higher recuperation) yielded higher cycle efficiencies and lower solar collector and receiver costs. The cycles with higher efficiencies (simple recuperated, recompression, and partial cooling) yielded the lowest overall solar and powerblock component costs for a prescribed power output.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleTechnoeconomic Analysis of Alternative Solarized s CO2 Brayton Cycle Configurations
typeJournal Paper
journal volume138
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Solar Energy Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4033573
journal fristpage51008
journal lastpage51008
identifier eissn1528-8986
treeJournal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record