Strength Criteria Versus Plastic Flow Criteria Used in Pressure Vessel Design and Analysis1Source: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 004::page 41402Author:Zhu, Xian
DOI: 10.1115/1.4031284Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: This paper presents a critical comparison of the traditional strength criteria and the modern plastic flow criteria used in the structural design and integrity assessment of pressure vessels. This includes (1) a brief review of the traditional strength criteria used in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel (B&PV) Code, (2) a discussion of the shortcomings of the traditional strength criteria when used to predict the burst pressure of pressure vessels, (3) an analysis of challenges, technical gaps, and basic needs to improve the traditional strength criteria, (4) a comparison of strength theories and plasticity theories for ductile materials, (5) an evaluation of available plastic flow criteria and their drawbacks in prediction of burst pressure of pressure vessels, (6) a description of a newly developed multiaxial yield criterion and its application to pressure vessels, and (7) a demonstration of experimental validation of the new plastic flow criterion when used to predict the burst pressure of thinwall pressure vessels. Finally, recommendations are made for further study to improve the traditional strength design criteria and to facilitate utilization of the modern plastic flow criteria for pressure vessel design and analysis.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Zhu, Xian | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:32:37Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T01:32:37Z | |
date issued | 2016 | |
identifier issn | 0094-9930 | |
identifier other | pvt_138_04_041402.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/162320 | |
description abstract | This paper presents a critical comparison of the traditional strength criteria and the modern plastic flow criteria used in the structural design and integrity assessment of pressure vessels. This includes (1) a brief review of the traditional strength criteria used in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel (B&PV) Code, (2) a discussion of the shortcomings of the traditional strength criteria when used to predict the burst pressure of pressure vessels, (3) an analysis of challenges, technical gaps, and basic needs to improve the traditional strength criteria, (4) a comparison of strength theories and plasticity theories for ductile materials, (5) an evaluation of available plastic flow criteria and their drawbacks in prediction of burst pressure of pressure vessels, (6) a description of a newly developed multiaxial yield criterion and its application to pressure vessels, and (7) a demonstration of experimental validation of the new plastic flow criterion when used to predict the burst pressure of thinwall pressure vessels. Finally, recommendations are made for further study to improve the traditional strength design criteria and to facilitate utilization of the modern plastic flow criteria for pressure vessel design and analysis. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Strength Criteria Versus Plastic Flow Criteria Used in Pressure Vessel Design and Analysis1 | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 138 | |
journal issue | 4 | |
journal title | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4031284 | |
journal fristpage | 41402 | |
journal lastpage | 41402 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8978 | |
tree | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 004 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |