Exergy, Energy, and Gas Flow Analysis of Hydrofractured Shale Gas ExtractionSource: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 006::page 61601Author:Lior, Noam
DOI: 10.1115/1.4032240Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The objectives of this study are to (a) evaluate the exergy and energy demand for constructing a hydrofractured shale gas well and determine its typical exergy and energy returns on investment (ExROI and EROI), and (b) compute the gas flow and intrinsic exergy analysis in the shale gas matrix and created fractures. An exergy system analysis of construction of a typical U.S. shale gas well, which includes the processes and materials exergies (embodied exergy) for drilling, casing and cementing, and hydrofracturing (“frackingâ€), was conducted. A gas flow and intrinsic exergy numerical simulation and analysis in a gascontaining hydrofractured shale reservoir with its formed fractures was then performed, resulting in the timeand twodimensional (2D) spacedependent pressure, velocity, and exergy loss fields in the matrix and fractures. The key results of the system analysis show that the total exergy consumption for constructing the typical hydrofractured shale gas well is 35.8 TJ, 49% of which is used for all the drilling needed for the well and casings and further 48% are used for the hydrofracturing. The embodied exergy of all construction materials is about 9.8% of the total exergy consumption. The ExROI for the typical range of shale gas wells in the U.S. was found to be 7.3–87.8. The embodied energy of manufactured materials is significantly larger than their exergy, so the total energy consumption is about 8% higher than the exergy consumption. The intrinsic exergy analysis showed, as expected, very slow (order of 10−9 m/s) gas flow velocities through the matrix, and consequently very small flow exergy losses. It clearly points to the desirability of exploring fracking methods that increase the number and length of effective fractures, and they increase well productivity with a relatively small flow exergy penalty.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Lior, Noam | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:27:42Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:27:42Z | |
| date issued | 2016 | |
| identifier issn | 0195-0738 | |
| identifier other | jert_138_06_061601.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/160882 | |
| description abstract | The objectives of this study are to (a) evaluate the exergy and energy demand for constructing a hydrofractured shale gas well and determine its typical exergy and energy returns on investment (ExROI and EROI), and (b) compute the gas flow and intrinsic exergy analysis in the shale gas matrix and created fractures. An exergy system analysis of construction of a typical U.S. shale gas well, which includes the processes and materials exergies (embodied exergy) for drilling, casing and cementing, and hydrofracturing (“frackingâ€), was conducted. A gas flow and intrinsic exergy numerical simulation and analysis in a gascontaining hydrofractured shale reservoir with its formed fractures was then performed, resulting in the timeand twodimensional (2D) spacedependent pressure, velocity, and exergy loss fields in the matrix and fractures. The key results of the system analysis show that the total exergy consumption for constructing the typical hydrofractured shale gas well is 35.8 TJ, 49% of which is used for all the drilling needed for the well and casings and further 48% are used for the hydrofracturing. The embodied exergy of all construction materials is about 9.8% of the total exergy consumption. The ExROI for the typical range of shale gas wells in the U.S. was found to be 7.3–87.8. The embodied energy of manufactured materials is significantly larger than their exergy, so the total energy consumption is about 8% higher than the exergy consumption. The intrinsic exergy analysis showed, as expected, very slow (order of 10−9 m/s) gas flow velocities through the matrix, and consequently very small flow exergy losses. It clearly points to the desirability of exploring fracking methods that increase the number and length of effective fractures, and they increase well productivity with a relatively small flow exergy penalty. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Exergy, Energy, and Gas Flow Analysis of Hydrofractured Shale Gas Extraction | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 138 | |
| journal issue | 6 | |
| journal title | Journal of Energy Resources Technology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4032240 | |
| journal fristpage | 61601 | |
| journal lastpage | 61601 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8994 | |
| tree | Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 006 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |