YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Predictive Modeling Techniques to Forecast Energy Demand in the United States: A Focus on Economic and Demographic Factors

    Source: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 002::page 22001
    Author:
    Deka, Angshuman
    ,
    Hamta, Nima
    ,
    Esmaeilian, Behzad
    ,
    Behdad, Sara
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4031632
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Effective energy planning and governmental decisionmaking policies heavily rely on accurate forecast of energy demand. This paper discusses and compares five different forecasting techniques to model energy demand in the United States using economic and demographic factors. Two artificial neural network (ANN) models, two regression analysis models, and one autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model are developed based on the historical data from 1950 to 2013. While ANN model 1 and regression model 1 use gross domestic product (GDP), gross national product (GNP), and per capita personal income as independent input factors, ANN model 2 and regression model 2 employ GDP, GNP, and population (POP) as the predictive factors. The forecasted values resulted from these models are compared with the forecast made by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) for the period of 2014–2019. The forecasted results of ANN models and regression model 1 are close to those of the U.S. EIA; however, the results of regression model 2 and ARIMA model are significantly different from the forecast made by the U.S. EIA. Finally, a comparison of the forecasted values resulted from three efficient models showed that the energy demand would vary between 95.51 and 100.08 quadrillion British thermal unit (btu) for the period of 2014–2019. In addition, we have discussed the possibility of selfsufficiency of the United States in terms of energy generation based on the information of current available technologies nationwide.
    • Download: (960.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Predictive Modeling Techniques to Forecast Energy Demand in the United States: A Focus on Economic and Demographic Factors

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/160852
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDeka, Angshuman
    contributor authorHamta, Nima
    contributor authorEsmaeilian, Behzad
    contributor authorBehdad, Sara
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:27:37Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:27:37Z
    date issued2016
    identifier issn0195-0738
    identifier otherjert_138_02_022001.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/160852
    description abstractEffective energy planning and governmental decisionmaking policies heavily rely on accurate forecast of energy demand. This paper discusses and compares five different forecasting techniques to model energy demand in the United States using economic and demographic factors. Two artificial neural network (ANN) models, two regression analysis models, and one autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model are developed based on the historical data from 1950 to 2013. While ANN model 1 and regression model 1 use gross domestic product (GDP), gross national product (GNP), and per capita personal income as independent input factors, ANN model 2 and regression model 2 employ GDP, GNP, and population (POP) as the predictive factors. The forecasted values resulted from these models are compared with the forecast made by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) for the period of 2014–2019. The forecasted results of ANN models and regression model 1 are close to those of the U.S. EIA; however, the results of regression model 2 and ARIMA model are significantly different from the forecast made by the U.S. EIA. Finally, a comparison of the forecasted values resulted from three efficient models showed that the energy demand would vary between 95.51 and 100.08 quadrillion British thermal unit (btu) for the period of 2014–2019. In addition, we have discussed the possibility of selfsufficiency of the United States in terms of energy generation based on the information of current available technologies nationwide.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titlePredictive Modeling Techniques to Forecast Energy Demand in the United States: A Focus on Economic and Demographic Factors
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4031632
    journal fristpage22001
    journal lastpage22001
    identifier eissn1528-8994
    treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian