YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Experimental Study on Identification Diffusion Pores, Permeation Pores and Cleats of Coal Samples

    Source: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 002::page 21201
    Author:
    Zou, Mingjun
    ,
    Wei, Chongtao
    ,
    Huang, Zhiquan
    ,
    Zhang, Miao
    ,
    Lv, Xiaochun
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4031610
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Coal pore systems can be commonly classified as diffusion pores, permeation pores and cleats. The classification accuracy influences the coalbed methane (CBM) migration processes from diffusion to permeation and then to outflow, and finally affects the predicted CBM recoverability. To classify coal pore systems precisely, measurements of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), and nitrogen adsorption isotherm (NAI) are conducted in this paper, and then a comprehensive classification method is proposed. The following cognitions are achieved. NMR spectra can be divided into three categories of threepeak, single narrow peak, and nonthree/nonsinglenarrow peak spectra. The former two categories can be directly used to identify coal pore systems as one peak representing one pore system, and pore systems of the last category can be distinguished by using cumulative amplitudes at the fully watersaturated and centrifuged conditions. Fractal theory suggests that the dividing radii of diffusion–permeation pores obtained by MIP and NAI are quite close, which indicates that the two methods are both effective and accurate. Comparisons between mercury intrusive and cumulative amplitudes indicate that the classification results obtained by measurements of MIP and NMR are similar, which can be a base for transforming transverse relaxation time to pore radius. As a result, the dividing radius of diffusion–permeation pores is about 65 nm, and that of permeation–cleat pores is approximately 600–700 nm.
    • Download: (1.273Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Experimental Study on Identification Diffusion Pores, Permeation Pores and Cleats of Coal Samples

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/160850
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZou, Mingjun
    contributor authorWei, Chongtao
    contributor authorHuang, Zhiquan
    contributor authorZhang, Miao
    contributor authorLv, Xiaochun
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:27:37Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:27:37Z
    date issued2016
    identifier issn0195-0738
    identifier otherjert_138_02_021201.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/160850
    description abstractCoal pore systems can be commonly classified as diffusion pores, permeation pores and cleats. The classification accuracy influences the coalbed methane (CBM) migration processes from diffusion to permeation and then to outflow, and finally affects the predicted CBM recoverability. To classify coal pore systems precisely, measurements of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), and nitrogen adsorption isotherm (NAI) are conducted in this paper, and then a comprehensive classification method is proposed. The following cognitions are achieved. NMR spectra can be divided into three categories of threepeak, single narrow peak, and nonthree/nonsinglenarrow peak spectra. The former two categories can be directly used to identify coal pore systems as one peak representing one pore system, and pore systems of the last category can be distinguished by using cumulative amplitudes at the fully watersaturated and centrifuged conditions. Fractal theory suggests that the dividing radii of diffusion–permeation pores obtained by MIP and NAI are quite close, which indicates that the two methods are both effective and accurate. Comparisons between mercury intrusive and cumulative amplitudes indicate that the classification results obtained by measurements of MIP and NMR are similar, which can be a base for transforming transverse relaxation time to pore radius. As a result, the dividing radius of diffusion–permeation pores is about 65 nm, and that of permeation–cleat pores is approximately 600–700 nm.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleExperimental Study on Identification Diffusion Pores, Permeation Pores and Cleats of Coal Samples
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4031610
    journal fristpage21201
    journal lastpage21201
    identifier eissn1528-8994
    treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian