Smart Well Pattern Optimization Using Gradient AlgorithmSource: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 001::page 12901DOI: 10.1115/1.4031208Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: For a long time, well pattern optimization mainly relies on human experience, numerical simulations are used to test different development plans and then a preferred program is chosen for field implementation. However, this kind of method cannot provide suitable optimal well pattern layout for different geological reservoirs. In recent years, more attentions have been paid to propose well placement theories combining optimization algorithm with reservoir simulation. But these theories are mostly applied in a situation with a small amount of wells. For numerous wells in a largescale reservoir, it is of great importance to pursue the optimal well pattern in order to obtain maximum economic benefits. The idea in this paper is originated from the idea presented by Onwunalu and Durlofsky (2011, “A New WellPatternOptimization Procedure for LargeScale Field Development,†SPE J., 16(3), pp. 594607), which focuses on well pattern optimization, and the innovations are as follows: (1) Combine well pattern variation with production control to get the optimal overall development plan. (2) Rechoose and simplify the optimization variables, deduce the new generation process of well pattern, and use perturbation gradient to solve mathematical model in order to ensure efficiency and accuracy of final results. (3) Constrain optimization variables by logtransformation method. (4) Boundary wells are reserved by shifting into boundary artificially to avoid abrupt change of objective function which leads to a nonoptimal result due to gradient discontinuity at reservoir edge. The method is illustrated by examples of homogeneous and heterogeneous reservoirs. For homogeneous reservoir, perturbation gradient algorithm yields a quite satisfied result. Meanwhile, heterogeneous reservoir tests realize optimization of various well patterns and indicate that gradient algorithm converges faster than particle swarm optimization (PSO).
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Zhang, Liming | |
contributor author | Zhang, Kai | |
contributor author | Chen, Yuxue | |
contributor author | Li, Meng | |
contributor author | Yao, Jun | |
contributor author | Li, Lixin | |
contributor author | Lee, JungIn | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:27:34Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T01:27:34Z | |
date issued | 2016 | |
identifier issn | 0195-0738 | |
identifier other | jert_138_01_012901.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/160835 | |
description abstract | For a long time, well pattern optimization mainly relies on human experience, numerical simulations are used to test different development plans and then a preferred program is chosen for field implementation. However, this kind of method cannot provide suitable optimal well pattern layout for different geological reservoirs. In recent years, more attentions have been paid to propose well placement theories combining optimization algorithm with reservoir simulation. But these theories are mostly applied in a situation with a small amount of wells. For numerous wells in a largescale reservoir, it is of great importance to pursue the optimal well pattern in order to obtain maximum economic benefits. The idea in this paper is originated from the idea presented by Onwunalu and Durlofsky (2011, “A New WellPatternOptimization Procedure for LargeScale Field Development,†SPE J., 16(3), pp. 594607), which focuses on well pattern optimization, and the innovations are as follows: (1) Combine well pattern variation with production control to get the optimal overall development plan. (2) Rechoose and simplify the optimization variables, deduce the new generation process of well pattern, and use perturbation gradient to solve mathematical model in order to ensure efficiency and accuracy of final results. (3) Constrain optimization variables by logtransformation method. (4) Boundary wells are reserved by shifting into boundary artificially to avoid abrupt change of objective function which leads to a nonoptimal result due to gradient discontinuity at reservoir edge. The method is illustrated by examples of homogeneous and heterogeneous reservoirs. For homogeneous reservoir, perturbation gradient algorithm yields a quite satisfied result. Meanwhile, heterogeneous reservoir tests realize optimization of various well patterns and indicate that gradient algorithm converges faster than particle swarm optimization (PSO). | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Smart Well Pattern Optimization Using Gradient Algorithm | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 138 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Energy Resources Technology | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4031208 | |
journal fristpage | 12901 | |
journal lastpage | 12901 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8994 | |
tree | Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |