In Vivo Kinematics of the Tibiotalar and Subtalar Joints in Asymptomatic Subjects: A High Speed Dual Fluoroscopy StudySource: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 009::page 91006Author:Roach, Koren E.
,
Wang, Bibo
,
Kapron, Ashley L.
,
Fiorentino, Niccolo M.
,
Saltzman, Charles L.
,
Bo Foreman, K.
,
Anderson, Andrew E.
DOI: 10.1115/1.4034263Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Measurements of joint kinematics are essential to understand the pathomechanics of ankle disease and the effects of treatment. Traditional motion capture techniques do not provide measurements of independent tibiotalar and subtalar joint motion. In this study, highspeed dual fluoroscopy images of ten asymptomatic adults were acquired during treadmill walking at 0.5 m/s and 1.0 m/s and a singleleg, balanced heelrise. Threedimensional (3D) CT models of each bone and dual fluoroscopy images were used to quantify in vivo kinematics for the tibiotalar and subtalar joints. Dynamic tibiotalar and subtalar mean joint angles often exhibited opposing trends during captured stance. During both speeds of walking, the tibiotalar joint had significantly greater dorsi/plantarflexion (D/P) angular ROM than the subtalar joint while the subtalar joint demonstrated greater inversion/eversion (In/Ev) and internal/external rotation (IR/ER) than the tibiotalar joint. During balanced heelrise, only D/P and In/Ev were significantly different between the tibiotalar and subtalar joints. Translational ROM in the anterior/posterior (AP) direction was significantly greater in the subtalar than the tibiotalar joint during walking at 0.5 m/s. Overall, our results support the longheld belief that the tibiotalar joint is primarily responsible for D/P, while the subtalar joint facilitates In/Ev and IR/ER. However, the subtalar joint provided considerable D/P rotation, and the tibiotalar joint rotated about all three axes, which, along with translational motion, suggests that each joint undergoes complex, 3D motion.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Roach, Koren E. | |
| contributor author | Wang, Bibo | |
| contributor author | Kapron, Ashley L. | |
| contributor author | Fiorentino, Niccolo M. | |
| contributor author | Saltzman, Charles L. | |
| contributor author | Bo Foreman, K. | |
| contributor author | Anderson, Andrew E. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:26:19Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:26:19Z | |
| date issued | 2016 | |
| identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
| identifier other | bio_138_09_091006.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/160452 | |
| description abstract | Measurements of joint kinematics are essential to understand the pathomechanics of ankle disease and the effects of treatment. Traditional motion capture techniques do not provide measurements of independent tibiotalar and subtalar joint motion. In this study, highspeed dual fluoroscopy images of ten asymptomatic adults were acquired during treadmill walking at 0.5 m/s and 1.0 m/s and a singleleg, balanced heelrise. Threedimensional (3D) CT models of each bone and dual fluoroscopy images were used to quantify in vivo kinematics for the tibiotalar and subtalar joints. Dynamic tibiotalar and subtalar mean joint angles often exhibited opposing trends during captured stance. During both speeds of walking, the tibiotalar joint had significantly greater dorsi/plantarflexion (D/P) angular ROM than the subtalar joint while the subtalar joint demonstrated greater inversion/eversion (In/Ev) and internal/external rotation (IR/ER) than the tibiotalar joint. During balanced heelrise, only D/P and In/Ev were significantly different between the tibiotalar and subtalar joints. Translational ROM in the anterior/posterior (AP) direction was significantly greater in the subtalar than the tibiotalar joint during walking at 0.5 m/s. Overall, our results support the longheld belief that the tibiotalar joint is primarily responsible for D/P, while the subtalar joint facilitates In/Ev and IR/ER. However, the subtalar joint provided considerable D/P rotation, and the tibiotalar joint rotated about all three axes, which, along with translational motion, suggests that each joint undergoes complex, 3D motion. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | In Vivo Kinematics of the Tibiotalar and Subtalar Joints in Asymptomatic Subjects: A High Speed Dual Fluoroscopy Study | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 138 | |
| journal issue | 9 | |
| journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4034263 | |
| journal fristpage | 91006 | |
| journal lastpage | 91006 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8951 | |
| tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 009 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |