YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Characterization of Transition to Turbulence for Blood in a Straight Pipe Under Steady Flow Conditions

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 007::page 71001
    Author:
    Biswas, Dipankar
    ,
    Casey, David M.
    ,
    Crowder, Douglas C.
    ,
    Steinman, David A.
    ,
    Yun, Yang H.
    ,
    Loth, Francis
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4033474
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Blood is a complex fluid that, among other things, has been established to behave as a shear thinning, nonNewtonian fluid when exposed to low shear rates (SR). Many hemodynamic investigations use a Newtonian fluid to represent blood when the flow field of study has relatively high SR (>200 s−1). Shear thinning fluids have been shown to exhibit differences in transition to turbulence (TT) compared to that of Newtonian fluids. Incorrect prediction of the transition point in a simulation could result in erroneous hemodynamic force predictions. The goal of the present study was to compare velocity profiles near TT of whole blood and Newtonian blood analogs in a straight rigid pipe with a diameter 6.35 mm under steady flow conditions. Rheology was measured for six samples of whole porcine blood and three samples of a Newtonian fluid, and the results show blood acts as a shear thinning nonNewtonian fluid. Measurements also revealed that blood viscosity at SR = 200 s−1 is significantly larger than at SR = 1000 s−1 (13.8%, p < 0.001). Doppler ultrasound (DUS) was used to measure velocity profiles for blood and Newtonian samples at different flow rates to produce Reynolds numbers (Re) ranging from 1000 to 3300 (based on viscosity at SR = 1000 s−1). Two mathematically defined methods, based on the velocity profile shape change and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), were used to detect TT. Results show similar parabolic velocity profiles for both blood and the Newtonian fluid for Re < 2200. However, differences were observed between blood and Newtonian fluid velocity profiles for larger Re. The Newtonian fluid had bluntlike velocity profiles starting at Re = 2403 آ±â€‰8 which indicated transition. In contrast, blood did not show this velocity profile change until Re = 2871 آ±â€‰104. The Newtonian fluid had large velocity fluctuations (root mean square (RMS) > 20%) with a maximum TKE near the pipe center at Re = 2316 آ±â€‰34 which indicated transition. In contrast, blood results showed the maximum TKE at Re = 2806 آ±â€‰109. Overall, the critical Re was delayed by ∼20% (p < 0.001) for blood compared to the Newtonian fluid. Thus, a Newtonian assumption for blood at flow conditions near transition could lead to large errors in velocity prediction for steady flow in a straight pipe. However, these results are specific to this pipe diameter and not generalizable since SR is highly dependent on pipe diameter. Further research is necessary to understand this relation in different pipe sizes, more complex geometries, and under pulsatile flow conditions.
    • Download: (4.013Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Characterization of Transition to Turbulence for Blood in a Straight Pipe Under Steady Flow Conditions

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/160414
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBiswas, Dipankar
    contributor authorCasey, David M.
    contributor authorCrowder, Douglas C.
    contributor authorSteinman, David A.
    contributor authorYun, Yang H.
    contributor authorLoth, Francis
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:26:11Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:26:11Z
    date issued2016
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherbio_138_06_061008.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/160414
    description abstractBlood is a complex fluid that, among other things, has been established to behave as a shear thinning, nonNewtonian fluid when exposed to low shear rates (SR). Many hemodynamic investigations use a Newtonian fluid to represent blood when the flow field of study has relatively high SR (>200 s−1). Shear thinning fluids have been shown to exhibit differences in transition to turbulence (TT) compared to that of Newtonian fluids. Incorrect prediction of the transition point in a simulation could result in erroneous hemodynamic force predictions. The goal of the present study was to compare velocity profiles near TT of whole blood and Newtonian blood analogs in a straight rigid pipe with a diameter 6.35 mm under steady flow conditions. Rheology was measured for six samples of whole porcine blood and three samples of a Newtonian fluid, and the results show blood acts as a shear thinning nonNewtonian fluid. Measurements also revealed that blood viscosity at SR = 200 s−1 is significantly larger than at SR = 1000 s−1 (13.8%, p < 0.001). Doppler ultrasound (DUS) was used to measure velocity profiles for blood and Newtonian samples at different flow rates to produce Reynolds numbers (Re) ranging from 1000 to 3300 (based on viscosity at SR = 1000 s−1). Two mathematically defined methods, based on the velocity profile shape change and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), were used to detect TT. Results show similar parabolic velocity profiles for both blood and the Newtonian fluid for Re < 2200. However, differences were observed between blood and Newtonian fluid velocity profiles for larger Re. The Newtonian fluid had bluntlike velocity profiles starting at Re = 2403 آ±â€‰8 which indicated transition. In contrast, blood did not show this velocity profile change until Re = 2871 آ±â€‰104. The Newtonian fluid had large velocity fluctuations (root mean square (RMS) > 20%) with a maximum TKE near the pipe center at Re = 2316 آ±â€‰34 which indicated transition. In contrast, blood results showed the maximum TKE at Re = 2806 آ±â€‰109. Overall, the critical Re was delayed by ∼20% (p < 0.001) for blood compared to the Newtonian fluid. Thus, a Newtonian assumption for blood at flow conditions near transition could lead to large errors in velocity prediction for steady flow in a straight pipe. However, these results are specific to this pipe diameter and not generalizable since SR is highly dependent on pipe diameter. Further research is necessary to understand this relation in different pipe sizes, more complex geometries, and under pulsatile flow conditions.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleCharacterization of Transition to Turbulence for Blood in a Straight Pipe Under Steady Flow Conditions
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4033474
    journal fristpage71001
    journal lastpage71001
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian