YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Strain Rosettes and Digital Image Correlation for Measuring Vertebral Body Strain

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 005::page 54501
    Author:
    Gustafson, Hannah
    ,
    Siegmund, Gunter
    ,
    Cripton, Peter
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4032799
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Strain gages are commonly used to measure bone strain, but only provide strain at a single location. Digital image correlation (DIC) is an optical technique that provides the displacement, and therefore strain, over an entire region of interest on the bone surface. This study compares vertebral body strains measured using strain gages and DIC. The anterior surfaces of 15 cadaveric porcine vertebrae were prepared with a strain rosette and a speckled paint pattern for DIC. The vertebrae were loaded in compression with a materials testing machine, and two highresolution cameras were used to image the anterior surface of the bones. The mean noise levels for the strain rosette and DIC were 1 خ¼خµ and 24 خ¼خµ, respectively. Bland–Altman analysis was used to compare strain from the DIC and rosette (excluding 44% of trials with some evidence of strain rosette failure or debonding); the mean difference آ±â€‰2 standard deviations (SDs) was −108 خ¼خµâ€‰آ±â€‰702 خ¼خµ for the minimum (compressive) principal strain and −53 خ¼خµâ€‰آ±â€‰332 خ¼خµ for the maximum (tensile) principal strain. Although the DIC has higher noise, it avoids the relatively high risk we observed of strain gage debonding. These results can be used to develop guidelines for selecting a method to measure strain on bone.
    • Download: (972.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Strain Rosettes and Digital Image Correlation for Measuring Vertebral Body Strain

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/160388
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGustafson, Hannah
    contributor authorSiegmund, Gunter
    contributor authorCripton, Peter
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:26:07Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:26:07Z
    date issued2016
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherbio_138_05_054501.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/160388
    description abstractStrain gages are commonly used to measure bone strain, but only provide strain at a single location. Digital image correlation (DIC) is an optical technique that provides the displacement, and therefore strain, over an entire region of interest on the bone surface. This study compares vertebral body strains measured using strain gages and DIC. The anterior surfaces of 15 cadaveric porcine vertebrae were prepared with a strain rosette and a speckled paint pattern for DIC. The vertebrae were loaded in compression with a materials testing machine, and two highresolution cameras were used to image the anterior surface of the bones. The mean noise levels for the strain rosette and DIC were 1 خ¼خµ and 24 خ¼خµ, respectively. Bland–Altman analysis was used to compare strain from the DIC and rosette (excluding 44% of trials with some evidence of strain rosette failure or debonding); the mean difference آ±â€‰2 standard deviations (SDs) was −108 خ¼خµâ€‰آ±â€‰702 خ¼خµ for the minimum (compressive) principal strain and −53 خ¼خµâ€‰آ±â€‰332 خ¼خµ for the maximum (tensile) principal strain. Although the DIC has higher noise, it avoids the relatively high risk we observed of strain gage debonding. These results can be used to develop guidelines for selecting a method to measure strain on bone.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleComparison of Strain Rosettes and Digital Image Correlation for Measuring Vertebral Body Strain
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4032799
    journal fristpage54501
    journal lastpage54501
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian