Film Cooling Performance of a Turbine Vane Suction Side: The Showerhead Effect on Film Cooling Hole Placement for Cylindrical and Fan Shaped HolesSource: Journal of Turbomachinery:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 009::page 91005DOI: 10.1115/1.4029966Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: In this paper, the transient IRthermography method is used to investigate the effect of showerhead cooling on the filmcooling performance of the suction side of a turbine guide vane working under enginerepresentative conditions. The resulting adiabatic film effectiveness, heat transfer coefficient (HTC) augmentation, and net heat flux reduction (NHFR) due to insertion of rows of cooling holes at two different locations in the presence and absence of the showerhead cooling are presented. One row of cooling holes is located in the relatively high convex surface curvature region, while the other is situated closer to the maximum throat velocity. In the latter case, a double staggered row of fanshaped cooling holes has been considered for crosscomparison with the single row at the same position. Both cylindrical and fanshaped holes have been examined, where the characteristics of fanshaped holes are based on design constraints for medium size gas turbines. The blowing rates tested are 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2 for single and double cooling rows, whereas the showerhead blowing is maintained at constant nominal blowing rate. The adiabatic film effectiveness results indicate that most noticable effects from the showerhead can be seen for the cooling row located on the higher convex surface curvature. This observation holds for both cylindrical and fanshaped holes. These findings suggest that while the showerhead blowing does not have much impact on this cooling row from HTC enhancement perspective, it is influential in determination of the HTC augmentation for the cooling row close to the maximum throat velocity. The doublerow fanshaped cooling seems to be less affected by an upstream showerhead blowing when considering HTC enhancement, but it makes a major contribution in defining adiabatic film effectiveness. The NHFR results highlight the fact that cylindrical holes are not significantly affected by the showerhead cooling regardless of their position, but showerhead blowing can play an important role in determining the overall filmcooling performance of fanshaped holes (for both the cooling row located on the higher convex surface curvature and the cooling row close to the maximum throat velocity), for both the single and the double row cases.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Najafabadi, Hossein Nadali | |
contributor author | Karlsson, Matts | |
contributor author | Kinell, Mats | |
contributor author | Utriainen, Esa | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:24:43Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T01:24:43Z | |
date issued | 2015 | |
identifier issn | 0889-504X | |
identifier other | turbo_137_09_091005.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/159965 | |
description abstract | In this paper, the transient IRthermography method is used to investigate the effect of showerhead cooling on the filmcooling performance of the suction side of a turbine guide vane working under enginerepresentative conditions. The resulting adiabatic film effectiveness, heat transfer coefficient (HTC) augmentation, and net heat flux reduction (NHFR) due to insertion of rows of cooling holes at two different locations in the presence and absence of the showerhead cooling are presented. One row of cooling holes is located in the relatively high convex surface curvature region, while the other is situated closer to the maximum throat velocity. In the latter case, a double staggered row of fanshaped cooling holes has been considered for crosscomparison with the single row at the same position. Both cylindrical and fanshaped holes have been examined, where the characteristics of fanshaped holes are based on design constraints for medium size gas turbines. The blowing rates tested are 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2 for single and double cooling rows, whereas the showerhead blowing is maintained at constant nominal blowing rate. The adiabatic film effectiveness results indicate that most noticable effects from the showerhead can be seen for the cooling row located on the higher convex surface curvature. This observation holds for both cylindrical and fanshaped holes. These findings suggest that while the showerhead blowing does not have much impact on this cooling row from HTC enhancement perspective, it is influential in determination of the HTC augmentation for the cooling row close to the maximum throat velocity. The doublerow fanshaped cooling seems to be less affected by an upstream showerhead blowing when considering HTC enhancement, but it makes a major contribution in defining adiabatic film effectiveness. The NHFR results highlight the fact that cylindrical holes are not significantly affected by the showerhead cooling regardless of their position, but showerhead blowing can play an important role in determining the overall filmcooling performance of fanshaped holes (for both the cooling row located on the higher convex surface curvature and the cooling row close to the maximum throat velocity), for both the single and the double row cases. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Film Cooling Performance of a Turbine Vane Suction Side: The Showerhead Effect on Film Cooling Hole Placement for Cylindrical and Fan Shaped Holes | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 137 | |
journal issue | 9 | |
journal title | Journal of Turbomachinery | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4029966 | |
journal fristpage | 91005 | |
journal lastpage | 91005 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8900 | |
tree | Journal of Turbomachinery:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 009 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |