Show simple item record

contributor authorAddy, Nathan J.
contributor authorKiliccote, Sila
contributor authorCallaway, Duncan S.
contributor authorMathieu, Johanna L.
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:23:23Z
date available2017-05-09T01:23:23Z
date issued2015
identifier issn0199-6231
identifier othersol_137_02_021008.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/159576
description abstractThe performance of buildings participating in demand response (DR) programs is usually evaluated with baseline models, which predict what electric demand would have been if a DR event had not been called. Different baseline models produce different results. Moreover, modelers implementing the same baseline model often make different model implementation choices producing different results. Using real data from a DR program in CA and a regressionbased baseline model, which relates building demand to time of week, outdoor air temperature, and building operational mode, we analyze the effect of model implementation choices on DR shed estimates. Results indicate strong sensitivities to the outdoor air temperature data source and bad data filtration methods, with standard deviations of differences in shed estimates of ≈20–30 kW, and weaker sensitivities to demand/temperature data resolution, data alignment, and methods for determining when buildings are occupied, with standard deviations of differences in shed estimates of ≈2–5 kW.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleHow Baseline Model Implementation Choices Affect Demand Response Assessments
typeJournal Paper
journal volume137
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Solar Energy Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4028478
journal fristpage21008
journal lastpage21008
identifier eissn1528-8986
treeJournal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record