Discussion: “A Review and Parametric Investigation Into Nanofluid Viscosity Models†(Nwosu, P. N., Meyer, J., and Sharifpur, M., 2014, ASME J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med., 5(3), p. 031008)Source: Journal of Nanotechnology in Engineering and Medicine:;2015:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 003::page 35501Author:Awad, M. M.
DOI: 10.1115/1.4032016Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Nwosu et al. [1] mentioned the empirical model of Maأ¯ga et al. [2] for ethylene glycol (EG)–خ³Al2O3 nanofluid. It should be noted that Nwosu et al. [1] did not mention the empirical model of Maأ¯ga et al. [2] for water–خ³Al2O3 nanofluid. This empirical model for water–خ³Al2O3 nanofluid wasDisplay Formula(1)خ·=خ·nfخ·bf=1+7.3د•+123د•2Nwosu et al. [1] mentioned the empirical models of Nguyen et al. [3] for Al2O3/H2O nanofluid with various particles sizes of 47 and 36 nm, respectively. It should be noted that Nwosu et al. [1] did not mention the empirical model of Nguyen et al. [3] for CuO/H2O nanofluid with 29 nm particle size. This empirical model for CuO/H2O nanofluid wasDisplay Formula(2)خ·=خ·nfخ·bf=1.475−0.319د•+0.051د•2+0.009د•3Also, it should be noted that the correct form of Eq. (21) in the paper of Nwosu et al. [1] based on the study of Nguyen et al. [3] isDisplay Formula(3)خ·=خ·nfخ·bf=1.1250−0.0007TThat is, the second term on the righthand side is −0.0007T and not −0.007T.
|
Show full item record
contributor author | Awad, M. M. | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:22:13Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T01:22:13Z | |
date issued | 2015 | |
identifier issn | 1949-2944 | |
identifier other | nano_006_03_035501.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/159270 | |
description abstract | Nwosu et al. [1] mentioned the empirical model of Maأ¯ga et al. [2] for ethylene glycol (EG)–خ³Al2O3 nanofluid. It should be noted that Nwosu et al. [1] did not mention the empirical model of Maأ¯ga et al. [2] for water–خ³Al2O3 nanofluid. This empirical model for water–خ³Al2O3 nanofluid wasDisplay Formula(1)خ·=خ·nfخ·bf=1+7.3د•+123د•2Nwosu et al. [1] mentioned the empirical models of Nguyen et al. [3] for Al2O3/H2O nanofluid with various particles sizes of 47 and 36 nm, respectively. It should be noted that Nwosu et al. [1] did not mention the empirical model of Nguyen et al. [3] for CuO/H2O nanofluid with 29 nm particle size. This empirical model for CuO/H2O nanofluid wasDisplay Formula(2)خ·=خ·nfخ·bf=1.475−0.319د•+0.051د•2+0.009د•3Also, it should be noted that the correct form of Eq. (21) in the paper of Nwosu et al. [1] based on the study of Nguyen et al. [3] isDisplay Formula(3)خ·=خ·nfخ·bf=1.1250−0.0007TThat is, the second term on the righthand side is −0.0007T and not −0.007T. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Discussion: “A Review and Parametric Investigation Into Nanofluid Viscosity Models†(Nwosu, P. N., Meyer, J., and Sharifpur, M., 2014, ASME J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med., 5(3), p. 031008) | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 6 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Journal of Nanotechnology in Engineering and Medicine | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4032016 | |
journal fristpage | 35501 | |
journal lastpage | 35501 | |
identifier eissn | 1949-2952 | |
tree | Journal of Nanotechnology in Engineering and Medicine:;2015:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |