A Systematic Method for Design PrototypingSource: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 008::page 81102Author:Camburn, Bradley
,
Dunlap, Brock
,
Gurjar, Tanmay
,
Hamon, Christopher
,
Green, Matthew
,
Jensen, Daniel
,
Crawford, Richard
,
Otto, Kevin
,
Wood, Kristin
DOI: 10.1115/1.4030331Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Scientific evaluation of prototyping practices is an emerging field in design research. Prototyping is critical to the success of product development efforts, and yet its implementation in practice is often guided by ad hoc experience. To address this need, we seek to advance the study and development of prototyping principles, techniques, and tools. A method to repeatedly enhance the outcome of prototyping efforts is reported in this paper. The research methodology to develop this method is as follows: (1) systematically identify practices that improve prototyping; (2) synthesize these practices to form a guiding method for designers; and (3) validate that the proposed method encourages best practices and improves performance. Prototyping practices are represented as six key heuristics to guide a designer in planning: how many iterations to pursue, how many unique design concepts to explore in parallel, as well as the use of scaled prototypes, isolated subsystem prototypes, relaxed requirements, and virtual prototypes. The method is correlated, through experimental investigation, with increased application of these best practices and improved design performance outcomes. These observations hold across various design problems studied. This method is novel in providing a systematic approach to prototyping.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Camburn, Bradley | |
contributor author | Dunlap, Brock | |
contributor author | Gurjar, Tanmay | |
contributor author | Hamon, Christopher | |
contributor author | Green, Matthew | |
contributor author | Jensen, Daniel | |
contributor author | Crawford, Richard | |
contributor author | Otto, Kevin | |
contributor author | Wood, Kristin | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:21:01Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T01:21:01Z | |
date issued | 2015 | |
identifier issn | 1050-0472 | |
identifier other | md_137_08_081102.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/158862 | |
description abstract | Scientific evaluation of prototyping practices is an emerging field in design research. Prototyping is critical to the success of product development efforts, and yet its implementation in practice is often guided by ad hoc experience. To address this need, we seek to advance the study and development of prototyping principles, techniques, and tools. A method to repeatedly enhance the outcome of prototyping efforts is reported in this paper. The research methodology to develop this method is as follows: (1) systematically identify practices that improve prototyping; (2) synthesize these practices to form a guiding method for designers; and (3) validate that the proposed method encourages best practices and improves performance. Prototyping practices are represented as six key heuristics to guide a designer in planning: how many iterations to pursue, how many unique design concepts to explore in parallel, as well as the use of scaled prototypes, isolated subsystem prototypes, relaxed requirements, and virtual prototypes. The method is correlated, through experimental investigation, with increased application of these best practices and improved design performance outcomes. These observations hold across various design problems studied. This method is novel in providing a systematic approach to prototyping. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | A Systematic Method for Design Prototyping | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 137 | |
journal issue | 8 | |
journal title | Journal of Mechanical Design | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4030331 | |
journal fristpage | 81102 | |
journal lastpage | 81102 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-9001 | |
tree | Journal of Mechanical Design:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 008 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |