Surface Pressures Developed on an Airfoil Undergoing Heaving and Pitching MotionSource: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 005::page 51105DOI: 10.1115/1.4029443Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The surface pressure distributions and flow patterns developed on and around a NACA 0012 airfoil undergoing heaving and pitching were investigated at Re = 3.6 أ— 104. Despite extensive investigations conducted by researchers elsewhere, the surface pressure measurements are, however, not readily available in the open archives, which are of importance not only in understanding the unsteadyairfoil boundarylayer flow but also for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation. Nevertheless, the results show that the behavior of the surface pressure distribution and the flow pattern of pure heaving closely resembled those of pure pitching. For combined heaving and pitching, the critical aerodynamic values (such as dynamic Cl,max, peak negative Cm, Clhysteresis and torsional damping) always exhibited a maximum value at phase shift د• = 0 deg. More interestingly, the د• = 180 deg phase shift produced a virtually unchanged surface pressure distribution over an entire combined motion cycle.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Lee, T. | |
contributor author | Su, Y. Y. | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:18:55Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T01:18:55Z | |
date issued | 2015 | |
identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
identifier other | fe_137_05_051105.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/158243 | |
description abstract | The surface pressure distributions and flow patterns developed on and around a NACA 0012 airfoil undergoing heaving and pitching were investigated at Re = 3.6 أ— 104. Despite extensive investigations conducted by researchers elsewhere, the surface pressure measurements are, however, not readily available in the open archives, which are of importance not only in understanding the unsteadyairfoil boundarylayer flow but also for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation. Nevertheless, the results show that the behavior of the surface pressure distribution and the flow pattern of pure heaving closely resembled those of pure pitching. For combined heaving and pitching, the critical aerodynamic values (such as dynamic Cl,max, peak negative Cm, Clhysteresis and torsional damping) always exhibited a maximum value at phase shift د• = 0 deg. More interestingly, the د• = 180 deg phase shift produced a virtually unchanged surface pressure distribution over an entire combined motion cycle. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Surface Pressures Developed on an Airfoil Undergoing Heaving and Pitching Motion | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 137 | |
journal issue | 5 | |
journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4029443 | |
journal fristpage | 51105 | |
journal lastpage | 51105 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-901X | |
tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 005 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |