YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Rigidity Analysis of Protein Molecules

    Source: Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering:;2015:;volume( 015 ):;issue: 003::page 31009
    Author:
    Shahbazi, Zahra
    ,
    Demirtas, Ahmet
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4029977
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Intrinsic flexibility of protein molecules enables them to change their 3D structure and perform their specific task. Therefore, identifying rigid regions and consequently flexible regions of proteins has a significant role in studying protein molecules' function. In this study, we developed a kinematic model of protein molecules considering all covalent and hydrogen bonds in protein structure. Then, we used this model and developed two independent rigidity analysis methods to calculate degrees of freedom (DOF) and identify flexible and rigid regions of the proteins. The first method searches for closed loops inside the protein structure and uses Grأ¼bler–Kutzbach (GK) criterion. The second method is based on a modified 3D pebble game. Both methods are implemented in a matlab program and the step by step algorithms for both are discussed. We applied both methods on simple 3D structures to verify the methods. Also, we applied them on several protein molecules. The results show that both methods are calculating the same DOF and rigid and flexible regions. The main difference between two methods is the run time. It's shown that the first method (GK approach) is slower than the second method. The second method takes 0.29 s per amino acid versus 0.83 s for the first method to perform this rigidity analysis.
    • Download: (1.223Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Rigidity Analysis of Protein Molecules

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/157411
    Collections
    • Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorShahbazi, Zahra
    contributor authorDemirtas, Ahmet
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:16:07Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:16:07Z
    date issued2015
    identifier issn1530-9827
    identifier otherjcise_015_03_031009.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/157411
    description abstractIntrinsic flexibility of protein molecules enables them to change their 3D structure and perform their specific task. Therefore, identifying rigid regions and consequently flexible regions of proteins has a significant role in studying protein molecules' function. In this study, we developed a kinematic model of protein molecules considering all covalent and hydrogen bonds in protein structure. Then, we used this model and developed two independent rigidity analysis methods to calculate degrees of freedom (DOF) and identify flexible and rigid regions of the proteins. The first method searches for closed loops inside the protein structure and uses Grأ¼bler–Kutzbach (GK) criterion. The second method is based on a modified 3D pebble game. Both methods are implemented in a matlab program and the step by step algorithms for both are discussed. We applied both methods on simple 3D structures to verify the methods. Also, we applied them on several protein molecules. The results show that both methods are calculating the same DOF and rigid and flexible regions. The main difference between two methods is the run time. It's shown that the first method (GK approach) is slower than the second method. The second method takes 0.29 s per amino acid versus 0.83 s for the first method to perform this rigidity analysis.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleRigidity Analysis of Protein Molecules
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume15
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4029977
    journal fristpage31009
    journal lastpage31009
    identifier eissn1530-9827
    treeJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering:;2015:;volume( 015 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian