Intricate Interrelation between Robustness and Probability in the Context of Structural OptimizationSource: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering:;2015:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 003::page 31003DOI: 10.1115/1.4030456Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: In this study, we deal with the problem of structural optimization under uncertainty. In previous studies, either of three philosophies were adopted: (a) probabilistic methodology, (b) fuzzysetsbased design, or (c) nonprobabilistic approach in the form of given bounds of variation of uncertain quantities. In these works, authors are postulating knowledge of either involved probability densities, membership functions, or bounds in the form of boxes or ellipsoids, where the uncertainty is assumed to vary. Here, we consider the problem in its apparently pristine setting, when the initial raw data are available and the uncertainty model in the form of bounds must be constructed. We treat the oftenencountered case when scarce data are available and the unknownbutbounded uncertainty is dealt with. We show that the probability concepts ought to be invoked for predicting the worstand bestpossible designs. The Chebyshev inequality, applied to the raw data, is superimposed with the study of the robustness of the associated deterministic optimal design. We demonstrate that there is an intricate relationship between robustness and probability.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Amir, Oded | |
contributor author | Elishakoff, Isaac | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:14:26Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T01:14:26Z | |
date issued | 2015 | |
identifier issn | 2332-9017 | |
identifier other | RISK_1_3_031003.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/156877 | |
description abstract | In this study, we deal with the problem of structural optimization under uncertainty. In previous studies, either of three philosophies were adopted: (a) probabilistic methodology, (b) fuzzysetsbased design, or (c) nonprobabilistic approach in the form of given bounds of variation of uncertain quantities. In these works, authors are postulating knowledge of either involved probability densities, membership functions, or bounds in the form of boxes or ellipsoids, where the uncertainty is assumed to vary. Here, we consider the problem in its apparently pristine setting, when the initial raw data are available and the uncertainty model in the form of bounds must be constructed. We treat the oftenencountered case when scarce data are available and the unknownbutbounded uncertainty is dealt with. We show that the probability concepts ought to be invoked for predicting the worstand bestpossible designs. The Chebyshev inequality, applied to the raw data, is superimposed with the study of the robustness of the associated deterministic optimal design. We demonstrate that there is an intricate relationship between robustness and probability. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Intricate Interrelation between Robustness and Probability in the Context of Structural Optimization | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 1 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4030456 | |
journal fristpage | 31003 | |
journal lastpage | 31003 | |
tree | ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering:;2015:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |