YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Endwall Loss Reduction of High Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoils Using Profile Contouring—Part I: Airfoil Design

    Source: Journal of Turbomachinery:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 008::page 81005
    Author:
    Eric Lyall, M.
    ,
    King, Paul I.
    ,
    Clark, John P.
    ,
    Sondergaard, Rolf
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4025951
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper presents the reasoning for and the design process of contouring a high lift frontloaded low pressure turbine (LPT) airfoil near the endwall to reduce the endwall loss. The test airfoil, L2F, was designed to the approximate gas angles with 38% larger pitchwise spacing than the widely studied Pack B airfoil. Being more frontloaded with a higher stagger angle, L2F is shown to produce more endwall losses than Pack B. It is suggested that the high endwall loss of L2F is due to the high stagger angle, not frontloading, as usually suggested in the literature. A procedure is presented to approximate the frontloading and stall resistance of L2F and obtain a low stagger version of that airfoil, designated as L2FLS. A contoured airfoil is then designed by transitioning L2F into L2FLS at the endwall to obtain a benefit from the reduced stagger angle at the endwall. Due to the contouring process generating a fillet, the contoured airfoil is referred to as L2FEF (“endwall filletâ€‌). Predictions in this paper suggest endwall loss reductions between 17% and 24% at Re = 100,000. Linear cascade experiments in Part II of this paper indicate that L2FEF reduces endwall losses more than 20% compared to L2F. The overall conclusion is that the stagger angle has a significant effect on endwall loss and should be considered for designing high lift LPT airfoils at the endwall.
    • Download: (2.324Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Endwall Loss Reduction of High Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoils Using Profile Contouring—Part I: Airfoil Design

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/156648
    Collections
    • Journal of Turbomachinery

    Show full item record

    contributor authorEric Lyall, M.
    contributor authorKing, Paul I.
    contributor authorClark, John P.
    contributor authorSondergaard, Rolf
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:13:45Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:13:45Z
    date issued2014
    identifier issn0889-504X
    identifier otherturbo_136_08_081005.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/156648
    description abstractThis paper presents the reasoning for and the design process of contouring a high lift frontloaded low pressure turbine (LPT) airfoil near the endwall to reduce the endwall loss. The test airfoil, L2F, was designed to the approximate gas angles with 38% larger pitchwise spacing than the widely studied Pack B airfoil. Being more frontloaded with a higher stagger angle, L2F is shown to produce more endwall losses than Pack B. It is suggested that the high endwall loss of L2F is due to the high stagger angle, not frontloading, as usually suggested in the literature. A procedure is presented to approximate the frontloading and stall resistance of L2F and obtain a low stagger version of that airfoil, designated as L2FLS. A contoured airfoil is then designed by transitioning L2F into L2FLS at the endwall to obtain a benefit from the reduced stagger angle at the endwall. Due to the contouring process generating a fillet, the contoured airfoil is referred to as L2FEF (“endwall filletâ€‌). Predictions in this paper suggest endwall loss reductions between 17% and 24% at Re = 100,000. Linear cascade experiments in Part II of this paper indicate that L2FEF reduces endwall losses more than 20% compared to L2F. The overall conclusion is that the stagger angle has a significant effect on endwall loss and should be considered for designing high lift LPT airfoils at the endwall.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleEndwall Loss Reduction of High Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoils Using Profile Contouring—Part I: Airfoil Design
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume136
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4025951
    journal fristpage81005
    journal lastpage81005
    identifier eissn1528-8900
    treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian