Show simple item record

contributor authorH. H. Bleich
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:13:44Z
date available2017-05-09T01:13:44Z
date copyrightDecember, 1972
date issued1972
identifier issn0021-8936
identifier otherJAMCAV-25969#983_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/156645
description abstractIt is known that in the quasi-static treatment of ideally elastoplastic solids, lack of uniqueness may occur unless associated flow rules are used. This has been illustrated by a simple example in reference [3]. The present study shows that the uniqueness difficulties in the foregoing and in similar situations disappear, if inertia forces are included in the analysis. As inertia forces in nature are unavoidable there may therefore be nothing improper in the use of nonassociated flow rules. One is simply not permitted to replace the actual dynamic situation in the limit by a quasi-static one. It is shown, however, that an entirely arbitrary selection of yield condition and flow rules is not permissible, but that the combination must satisfy a requirement which is derived. No general proof of uniqueness of dynamic problems for material prescriptions satisfying this requirement is as yet available. It is the purpose of the paper to induce interested investigators to search for such a general proof.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleOn Uniqueness in Ideally Elastoplastic Problems in Case of Nonassociated Flow Rules
typeJournal Paper
journal volume39
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Applied Mechanics
identifier doi10.1115/1.3422902
journal fristpage983
journal lastpage987
identifier eissn1528-9036
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsInertia (Mechanics)
keywordsForce AND Solids
treeJournal of Applied Mechanics:;1972:;volume( 039 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record