YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Fully Implicit, Lower Bound, Multi Axial Solution Strategy for Direct Ratchet Boundary Evaluation: Implementation and Comparison

    Source: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 001::page 11205
    Author:
    Jappy, Alan
    ,
    Mackenzie, Donald
    ,
    Chen, Haofeng
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4024450
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Ensuring sufficient safety against ratcheting is a fundamental requirement in pressure vessel design. However, determining the ratchet boundary using a full elasticplastic finite element analysis can be problematic and a number of direct methods have been proposed to overcome difficulties associated with ratchet boundary evaluation. This paper proposes a new lower bound ratchet analysis approach, similar to the previously proposed hybrid method but based on fully implicit elasticplastic solution strategies. The method utilizes superimposed elastic stresses and modified radial return integration to converge on the residual state throughout, resulting in one finite element model suitable for solving the cyclic stresses (stage 1) and performing the augmented limit analysis to determine the ratchet boundary (stage 2). The modified radial return methods for both stages of the analysis are presented, with the corresponding stress update algorithm and resulting consistent tangent moduli. Comparisons with other direct methods for selected benchmark problems are presented. It is shown that the proposed method evaluates a consistent lower bound estimate of the ratchet boundary, which has not previously been clearly demonstrated for other lower bound approaches. Limitations in the description of plastic strains and compatibility during the ratchet analysis are identified as being a cause for the differences between the proposed methods and current upper bound methods.
    • Download: (1.250Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Fully Implicit, Lower Bound, Multi Axial Solution Strategy for Direct Ratchet Boundary Evaluation: Implementation and Comparison

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/156096
    Collections
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJappy, Alan
    contributor authorMackenzie, Donald
    contributor authorChen, Haofeng
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:11:50Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:11:50Z
    date issued2014
    identifier issn0094-9930
    identifier otherpvt_136_01_011205.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/156096
    description abstractEnsuring sufficient safety against ratcheting is a fundamental requirement in pressure vessel design. However, determining the ratchet boundary using a full elasticplastic finite element analysis can be problematic and a number of direct methods have been proposed to overcome difficulties associated with ratchet boundary evaluation. This paper proposes a new lower bound ratchet analysis approach, similar to the previously proposed hybrid method but based on fully implicit elasticplastic solution strategies. The method utilizes superimposed elastic stresses and modified radial return integration to converge on the residual state throughout, resulting in one finite element model suitable for solving the cyclic stresses (stage 1) and performing the augmented limit analysis to determine the ratchet boundary (stage 2). The modified radial return methods for both stages of the analysis are presented, with the corresponding stress update algorithm and resulting consistent tangent moduli. Comparisons with other direct methods for selected benchmark problems are presented. It is shown that the proposed method evaluates a consistent lower bound estimate of the ratchet boundary, which has not previously been clearly demonstrated for other lower bound approaches. Limitations in the description of plastic strains and compatibility during the ratchet analysis are identified as being a cause for the differences between the proposed methods and current upper bound methods.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Fully Implicit, Lower Bound, Multi Axial Solution Strategy for Direct Ratchet Boundary Evaluation: Implementation and Comparison
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume136
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4024450
    journal fristpage11205
    journal lastpage11205
    identifier eissn1528-8978
    treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian